<b>Representation as limitation - a critique of Deleuze to Heidegger's ontological difference</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v32i1.5256
Keywords:
ente, identity, metaphysics, assumption, being
Abstract
This article intends to discuss the critique of Deleuze to Heidegger, as regards the problem of representation. It presents initially the Deleuzian argument on what he calls as the dogmatic image of thought. The intention is to highlight the points that, according to the French philosopher, contaminate the philosophy of difference by Heidegger. In a second stage, it addresses the theme of ontological difference on the principle of the German philosopher. Arguments are then reported indicating possible inconsistencies in the criticism of Deleuze, which accuses Heidegger for getting rid of objective assumptions at the expense of giving subjective assumptions.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2010-02-17
How to Cite
Ferronatto, M. A. S. V. (2010). <b>Representation as limitation - a critique of Deleuze to Heidegger’s ontological difference</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v32i1.5256. Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences, 32(1), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihumansoc.v32i1.5256
Issue
Section
Philosophy
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 4.0 properly.
