Mythology: Moritz and the Logic of Fantasy

  • Pedro Franceschini Universidade Federal da Bahia
Keywords: estética; mitologia; autonomia; simbólico; época de Goethe.

Abstract

We aim to present Karl Philipp Moritz's thoughts on mythology as expressed in his Doctrine of Gods [Götterlehre] of 1791. Despite being relatively unknown, the author has been acknowledged as an important figure in the aesthetic thought of the period by authors such as Goethe, Schiller, and Schelling. We would like to analyze Moritz's novel perspective on approaching mythological creations, understood as a language of fantasy, distinct from the usual allegorical and historical interpretations. This approach, emphasizing the autonomous nature of mythology, is grounded, as we argue, in the aesthetic thought he developed in earlier years. Here, the assertion of a concept of a perfect and self-contained work of art, and the notion of an artistic creation whose organic formative force precedes subjectivity, constitute complementary poles of a radical thought on the autonomy of art, which, not coincidentally, seems to find its fullest expression precisely in Moritz's conception of mythology. Lastly, this intricate relationship between aesthetics and mythology reveals a new way of thinking, or, if we prefer, a new logic, critical of the determinations of traditional metaphysics and much closer to a symbolic thought.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Referências

Blumenberg, H. (1990). Wirklichkeitsbegriff und Wirkungspotential des Mythos. In M. Fuhrmann (Ed.), Terror und Spiel. Probleme der Mythenrezeption (p. 11-66). Paderborn, DE: Wilhelm Fink.

Boulby, M. (1979). Karl Philipp Moritz: at the fringe of genius. Toronto; Buffalo; London: University of Toronto Press.

Fontenelle, B. (1825). De l‘origine des fables (Oeuvres: Tome Quatrième). Paris, FR: Salmon, Libraire-Éditeur.

Gockel, H. (1981). Mythos und Poesie: zum Mythos begriff in Aufklärung und Frühromantik. Frankfurt am Main: Tübingen.

Goethe, J. W., Michel, C., & Dewitz, H.-G. (1993). Italienische Reise. Teil I (Sämtliche Werke, Briefe, Tagebücher und Gespräche ‒ Band XV/1). Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.

Guilbert, P. (1999). Welche neuzeitlichen Strategien für die Rettung der antiken Mythologie?: Vergleich von drei, Handbüchern zur Götterlehre um 1790: K. W. Ramler - Ch. H. Heyne / M. G. Hermann - K. Ph. Moritz. Goethe Yearbook, 9, 186-221.

Jaeger, C. F. W. (1830). Translator’s Preface. In K. P. Moritz (Ed.). Mythological fictions of the Greek and Romans (p. v-vi). New York, NY: Carvill.

Kerényi, K. (1955). Gedanken über die Zeitmäßigkeit einer Darstellung der griechischen Mythologie. Studium Generale, 8, 268-272.

Moritz, K. P. (2018). Schriften zur Mythologie undf Altertumskunde. Teil 2, Götterlehre und andere mythologische Schriften (M. Disselkamp, Ed.). De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110545487

Moritz, K. P. (2022). Ensaios de Karl Philipp Moritz: Linguagem, arte e filosofia (J. F. Sabino, Trad.). São Paulo, SP: Editora USP.

Schelling, F. W. J. (2010). Filosofia da arte (M. Suzuki, Trad.). São Paulo, SP: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.

Schreiber, E. (2012). The topography of modernity: Karl Philipp Moritz and the space of autonomy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Schrimpf, H. J. (1972) Die Sprache der Phantasie. In H. O. Burger (Ed.). Begriffsbestimmung der Klassik und des Klassischen (p. 272-305). Darmstadt, DE: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Suzuki, M. (2005) A ciência simbólica do mundo. In A. Novaes. (Org.). Poetas que pensaram o mundo (p. 199-224). São Paulo, SP: Companhia das Letras.

Todorov, T. (1996). Teorias do símbolo (E. A. Dobránszky, Trad.). Campinas, SP: Papirus.

Torres Filho, R. R. (2004). Ensaios de filosofia ilustrada. São Paulo, SP: Iluminuras, 2004.

Published
2024-12-13
How to Cite
Franceschini, P. (2024). Mythology: Moritz and the Logic of Fantasy. Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences, 46(3), e73572. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihumansoc.v46i3.73572
Section
Philosophy