<b>Bilingualism and linguistic politics in Brazil: From monolingual unreality to plurilingual reality

  • Elena Ortiz Preuss Universidade Federal de Goiás
  • Margarida Rosa Álvares Universidade Federal de Goiás
Keywords: bilingual communities, official documents, legislation, teaching

Abstract

Current article discusses the linguistic policies inBrazil and problematizes explicit or underlying notions of bilingualism in official documents. Different concepts of bilingualism over time are analyzed from a bibliographic and documental study. Further, the types of bilingualism contemplated by linguistic policies are investigated. The status of Portuguese, indigenous, foreign, sign and immigrant languages in these documents is discussed, as well as the legal attitudes related to bilingualism in communities of immigrants, indigenous, deaf and descendants of Negro slaves. An initial legal ambiguity may be noted when essentially monolingual linguistic policies are prioritized. A mild progress has occurred during the last few years, mainly, those related to the acknowledgement of indigenous communities as bi/multilingual. In fact, Brazil’s plurilingual condition and its pluricultural characteristics have not been yet acknowledged.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Elena Ortiz Preuss, Universidade Federal de Goiás

Doutora em Estudos da Linguagem pela UFRGS.

Departamento de Línguas e Literaturas Estrangeiras, Área de Espanhol.

Programa de Pós-graduação em Letras e Linguística, da UFG

Margarida Rosa Álvares, Universidade Federal de Goiás

Doutoranda em Letras e Linguística pela UFG.

Departamento de Línguas e Literaturas Estrangeiras, Área de Espanhol.

Published
2014-11-14
How to Cite
Preuss, E. O., & Álvares, M. R. (2014). <b&gt;Bilingualism and linguistic politics in Brazil: From monolingual unreality to plurilingual reality. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 36(4), 403-414. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v36i4.23169
Section
Linguistics

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus