<b><i>The deep search of knowledge</i>: George Chapman's glosses in <i>The Shadow of Night</i> (1594)

  • Lavinia Silvares Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Abstract

This paper addresses the glosses of the first edition of George Chapman's philosophical elegy, The Shadow of Night (1594), as a specific and common practice of prescriptive work, produced by Renaissance authors following the ancient tradition of the auctoris interpretatio. Assuming the gloss as an exposition and scrutiny of the places of poetic invention and elocution, Chapman puts himself in the position of both annotator and authorizer of his text, defining a particular legibility for the poem within the learned circles of the English court of Shakespeare’s time. Considering the view of the glossarial practice as an emulation of the ancient scholium work of ‘exposing the difficulties’ of a literary text and thus legitimizing it as fit to enter the proper tradition, this paper discusses, 1. the implications of Chapman's glosses for the poem's immediate reception; 2. the importance of authorized role models (Servius, Macrobius, Cornutus) for the glossarial practice; and 3. the idea that a text does not possess a congenital clearness of its own, but can only be understood through the continuous process of a specific glossarial assessment. 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Lavinia Silvares, Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Lavinia Silvares é professora de Literatura Inglesa na Universidade Federal de São Paulo desde 2009. É autora do livro "Nenhum Homem é uma Ilha": John Donne e a Poética da Agudeza (2015) e membro da Renaissance Society of America (RSA), da International Society for the History of Rhetoric (ISHR) e da Sociedade Brasileira de Retórica (SBR), da qual foi vice-presidente (2012-2014).
Published
2017-07-06
How to Cite
Silvares, L. (2017). <b><i>The deep search of knowledge</i>: George Chapman’s glosses in <i>The Shadow of Night</i&gt; (1594). Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 39(3), 321-327. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v39i3.32208
Section
Literature

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus