Critical discourse analysis: didactic approach proposal with undergraduate students

Keywords: critical discourse analysis; mediatized speech; discursive analysis practices; undergraduate students.

Abstract

The critical analysis of mediated discourses allows us to understand the texts beyond the texts themselves, through the analysis of discursive strategies and the construction of meanings of social actors. Understanding the social contexts in the (social) functioning of discourses is justified in teaching Pragmatics with undergraduate students. Such is the case of students who attend courses in Social Communication, insofar as the transformation of discourses to be disseminated through the mass media (whether traditional or new media) will certainly be an object of work in their future professional practices. Exemplifying how the teaching of Pragmatics can be mobilized for the professional life of these students, this article focuses on the results of a didactic proposal of critical analysis of mediated discourses by finalist students of Social Communication. This qualitative research was carried out in the 2021/2022 school year and involved a content analysis based on the students' discursive analysis practices, who had a didactic guide to support their analysis work. This case study, with 60 participants, revealed to us the opportunity of this proposal for students to understand discourses as social practices, which result and give rise (simultaneously) to social phenomena, which are important to know. At the same time, this proposal made it possible to contribute to the development of analytical-critical and reflective-interpretive capacities, which are important for the future professional action of these participants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Referências

Amado, J. (2013). Questionários abertos e “composições.” In J. Amado (Coord.), Manual de investigação qualitativa em educação (p. 271-274). Coimbra, PT: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra.

Amossy, R. (2008). Imagens de si no discurso: a construção do ethos. São Paulo, SP: Contexto.

Austin, J. L. (1965). How to do things with words. New York, NY: New York Press.

Bakhtin, M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination four essays (p. 269-422). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Bardin, L. (1979). Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa, PT: Edições 70.

Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1994). Investigação qualitativa em educação: uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos. Porto, PT: Porto Editora.

Carvalho, A. (2015). Discurso mediático e sociedade: repensar a análise crítica do discurso. EID&A - Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Integrados em Discurso e Argumentação, 175-199.

Charaudeau. P. (2002, 11 de mai.). O discurso entre a ação e a comunicação. Recuperado de http://www.patrick-charaudeau.com/O-discurso-entre-a-acao-e-a.html

Cunha, I. F., & Peixinho, A. T. (2020). Análise dos média (2a ed.). Coimbra, PT: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra.

Grice, P. (1996). Cooperation and implicature. In G. Yule (Ed.), Pragmatics (p. 36-47). Oxônia, GB: Oxford University Press.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. Londres, UK: Longman.

Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies. A multidisciplinary introduction. Vol. 2. Discourse as social interaction (p. 258-284). London, GB: Sage.

Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Londres, UK: Penguin.

Koetsenruijter, W. (2008). How numbers make news reliable. In L. Dam, L.-L. Holmgreen, & J. Strunck (Eds.), Rhetorical aspects of discourses in present-day society (193-205). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Lessard-Hébert, M., Goyette, G., Boutin, G., & Reis, M. J. (2005). Investigação qualitativa: fundamentos e práticas (2a ed.). Lisboa, PT: Instituto Piaget.

Matheson, D. (2005). Media discourses. Analysing media texts. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

Pêcheux, M. (1997). O discurso: estrutura ou acontecimento (2a ed.). Campinas, SP: Pontes.

Pedro, E. R. (1997). Análise crítica do discurso: aspectos teóricos, metodológicos e analíticos. In E. R. Pedro (Orgs.), Análise crítica do discurso: uma perspectiva sociopolítica e funcional (p. 19-46). Lisboa, PT: Caminho.

Pinto, R. (2021). Argumentação retórica e ethos organizacional: estudos de caso em contexto português. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 43(1), e56904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v43i1.56904

Ramos, R., & Carvalho, A. (2008). Science as rhetoric in media discourses on climate change. In L. Dam, L.-L. Holmgreen, & J. Strunck (Eds.), Rhetorical aspects of discourses in present-day society (223-247). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837

Santos, J. V. (2011). Linguagem e comunicação. Coimbra, PT: Almedina.

Vala, J. (1989). A análise de conteúdo. In A. S. Silva & J. M. Pinto (Eds.), Metodologia das Ciências Sociais (3a ed., p. 101-128). Porto, PT: Edições Afrontamento.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(3), 359-383.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2016). Discurso-cognição-sociedade: estado atual e perspectivas da abordagem sociocognitiva do discurso. Letrônica, 9(supl.), s8-s29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2016.s.23189

Van Dijk, T. A. (2017). Discurso, notícia e ideologia: estudos na análise crítica do discurso (2a ed.). Ribeirão, PT: Edições Húmus.

Yin, R. K. (2013). Applications of case study research. SAGE Publications.

Published
2024-04-12
How to Cite
Macário, M. J., & Silva, A. I. (2024). Critical discourse analysis: didactic approach proposal with undergraduate students. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 46(1), e69372. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v46i1.69372
Section
Linguistics

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus