<b>The paradox in Language Argumentation Theory: a linguistic-argumentative issue</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v31i2.6543
Keywords:
paradox, language argumentation, paradoxical enchainments, discourse theories
Abstract
In the Language Argumentation Theory (TAL), the concept of paradox is linked to the hypothesis that it can be defined in merely linguistic terms. In this definition, it is understood that there is a structural argumentation related to some expressions in natural languages. This concept indicates that language is associated to some words and their internal argumentations. Through the analysis of paradoxical enchainments, defined by Oswald Ducrot and Marion Carel (2001), in the Language Argumentation Theory, this article aims to confirm that some kinds of paradox can be explained in strictly linguistic terms, without being considered something contradictory, absurd or even difficult to understand.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
Published
2009-10-06
How to Cite
Grégis, R. A. (2009). <b>The paradox in Language Argumentation Theory: a linguistic-argumentative issue</b> - DOI: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v31i2.6543. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 31(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v31i2.6543
Issue
Section
Linguistics
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 4.0 properly.
6.png){kind=logo}
