Evaluation of an educational process about prevention of pressure injury
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4025/ciencuidsaude.v19i0.49917Keywords:
Nursing care, Education, Nursing, Pressure Ulcer, Patient SafetyAbstract
Objective: to describe an educational process on prevention of pressure injury, as well as to Assess in a formative manner this process based on the theoretical framework of Paulo Freire and the Methodology of Problematization through the Arch of Maguerez. Method: a study of educational intervention, with qualitative approach, carried out in a PIblic university hospital in the city of Dourados, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, during March and April, 2018, and approved by Ethics Committee on Research with Human Beings. The data were collected during the educational meetings, which were recorded, in its entirety, in audio. Subsequently, they were transcribed and analyzed by the content analysis technique, comprehending, thus, the thematic categories, which correlated with the theoretical references of the author Paulo Freire. Results: parting from the analysis of the speeches, evaluative writings and field journal notes, the following categories were identified: dialogue; problematization; research/investigation; and evaluation of educational meetings. Final considerations: the adopted educational strategies were successful, it received good evaluations from participants and promoted an environment for discussion in groups, mobilization for the improvement of assistance practices, exchange of experiences and reflection on the subject.
Downloads
References
2. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Nota técnica GVIMS/GGTES n° 03/2017: Práticas seguras para prevenção de Lesão por Pressão em serviços de saúde [Internet]. Brasília (DF); 2017. [cited 2019 Set 05]. Disponível em: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/documents/33852/271855/Nota+T%C3%A9cnica+GVIMS-GGTES+n%C2%BA+03-2017/54ec39f6-84e0-4cdb-a241-31491ac6e03e
3.Melleiro MM, Tronchin DMR, Baptista CMC, Braga AT, Paulino A, Kurcgant P.Pressure ulcers prevalence indicators and patient falls incidence in teaching hospitals in the city of São Paulo. Rev. Esc.Enferm. USP. 2015; 49(Esp2):55-59. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420150000800008
4. Soares CF, Heidemann ITSB.Health promotion and prevention of pressure injury:
expectations of primary health care nurses. Texto&contexto enferm. 2018;27(2): e1630016. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-070720180001630016
5. Miccas FL, Batista SHSS. Permanent education in health: a review. Rev. saúde pública. 2014;48(1):170-85. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048004498.
6. Freire PRN. Pedagogia do oprimido. 58ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra; 2014.
7. Taquette SR, Minayo MC. Análise de estudos qualitativos conduzidos por médicos publicados em periódicos científicos brasileiros entre 2004 e 2013.Physis. 2016;26(2): 417-434. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312016000200005
8. Teixeira E.A metodologia da problematização com o Arco de Maguerez: uma reflexão
teórico-epistemológica - resenha. Rev. enferm.UFPI. [Internet]. 2015 [citado 2019Nov 14];4(3): 99-100. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufpi.br/index.php/reufpi/article/view/4173/pdf
9. Anastasiou LGC, Alves LP. Processos de ensinagem na universidade: pressupostos para as estratégias de trabalho em aula. Joinville: Editora Univille; 2015.
10. Silva AKC, Oliveira KMM, Coelho MMF, Moura DJM, Miranda KCL. Development and validation of an educational game for adolescents about breastfeeding. Rev. baiana enferm. 2017;31(1):e16476. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18471/rbe.v31i1.16476
11. Santos L. A articulação entre a avaliação somativa e a formativa, na prática pedagógica: uma impossibilidade ou um desafio? Ensaio: aval. pol. públ. educ. 2016;24(92): 637-669. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362016000300006
12. Bardin L. Análise de Conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70; 2016.
13. Freire PRN. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. 43a ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra; 2011.
14. Gul A, Andsoy II, Ozkaya B, Zeydan A. A Descriptive, Cross-sectional Survey of Turkish Nurses’ Knowledge of Pressure Ulcer Risk, Prevention, and Staging. Ostomy wound Manage. [Internet] 2017 [cited 2018 Dez 21];63(6):40-46. Available from:https://www.o-wm.com/article/descriptive-cross-sectional-survey-turkish-nurses-knowledge-pressure-ulcer-risk-prevention
15. Soares RSA, Saul AMR, Silva RM, Timm AMB, Bin A, Durgante VL. Educational intervention as a process of knowledge construction in the care of pressure ulcers. Rev.enferm. UFPE on line. 2014;8(6):1658-65. doi: 10.5205/reuol.5876-50610-1-SM.0806201427
16. Mauricio AB, Lemos DS, Crosewski NI, Roehrs H. Conhecimentos dos profissionais de enfermagem relacionados à s úlceras por pressão. Rev enferm. UFSM. 2014; 4(4):751-60. 15. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/2179769211707
17. Rocha LES, Ruas EFG, Santos JAD, Lima CA, Carneiro JA, Costa FM. Prevention of pressure ulcers: evaluation of nursing professionals’ knowledge. Cogitare enferm. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2018 Set 28]; 20(3): 596-604. Available from:https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/41750/26270
18. Galvão NS, Serique MAB, Santos VLCG, Nogueira PC. Knowledge of the nursing team on pressure ulcer prevention. Rev.bras.enferm. 2017; 70(2):294-300. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0063
19. Crosewski NI, Lemos DS, Mauricio AB, Roehrs H, Meier MJ. Knowledge of nursing professionals regarding pressure ulcers in two surgical units – part 1. Cogitare enferm. 2015; 20(1):74-80. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0063
20. Severo VRG, Santos RP, Neves ET, Ribeiro CF.Previous knowledge of caregivers for children with special health needs: a freirian approach. Ciênc.cuid. saúde. 2019; 18(3) e46351. doi: 10.4025/cienccuidsaude.v18i2.46351
