Reflexes of the Labor Reform on the mitigation of judicializations and on the performance of the courts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4025/enfoque.v43i3.61632Keywords:
labor legislation; labor reform; labor judicializations; performance; labor courts.Abstract
Objective: This study investigates the effects of the 2017 labor reform on the mitigation of labor judicializations and on the performance of labor courts, in addition to verifying, with originality, its effects on the generation of formal jobs and on the movement of the economy, considering regions and economic sectors.
Methodology: Documentary research was carried out in government sources and to the data a comparative qualitative analysis of time series between the years 2015 and 2020 was applied.
Results: The results show that, in general, there were positive effects in reducing the number of labor lawsuits in the post-reform period, but there is evidence to believe that in the short term there was no improvement in the performance indices of the labor courts.
Originality: The analysis of the 2017 labor reform on the performance of the labor courts is original, as no studies were found that analyzed the results of the new legislation on the performance of the labor judiciary. Thus, it has the novelty of presenting the consequences of the reform on public efficiency and procedural dynamics, considering regions and economic sectors.
Theoretical and practical contributions: The study contributes to the literature that investigates the relationship between changes in legislation and their interrelationship with public efficiency, while presenting implications for the managerial practice of the Brazilian judiciary, as it increases empirical evidence on the topic investigated.
Downloads
References
Adascalitei, D., & Morano, C.P. (2015). Labour market reforms since the crisis: drivers and consequences. International Labour Office, Working Paper No. 5. Recuperado de: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---inst/documents/publication/wcms_414588.pdf
Adascalitei, D., & Morano, C.P. (2016). Drivers and effects of labour market reforms: evidence from a novel policy compendium. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 5(15), 1-32.
Avdagic, S., & Salardi, P. (2013). Tenuous link: labour market institutions and unemployment in advanced and new market economies. Socio-Economic Review, 11(4), 739-769.
Bassanini, A., & Duval, R. (2006). The determinants of unemployment across OECD countries: Reassessing the role of policies and institutions. OECD Economic Studies, 1, 7-86.
Behn, R.D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586-606.
Bernal-Verdugo L.E., Furceri, D., & Guillaume, D.M. (2012). Crises, labor market policy, and unemployment. IMF Working Paper, 12-65.
Buscaglia, E. (2001). An economic and jurimetric analysis of official corruption in the courts: a go vernancebased approach. Global Programme Against Corruption. Research and Scientific Series, Viena, Elsevier Science Press.
Buta, B.O., Gomes, A.O., & Lima, C.M. (2020). Proposta de um índice de desempenho para a Defensoria Pública da União. Revista Direito GV, 16, 2.
Cadastro Geral de Empregados e Desempregados (CAGED). (2021). Evolução de emprego do CAGED - EEC. Recuperado de: http://bi.mte.gov.br/eec/pages/consultas/evolucaoEmprego/consultaEvolucaoEmprego.xhtml#relatorioSubSet
Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ). (2020). Justiça em números 2020: ano-base 2019. Brasília: CNJ. Recuperado de: https://www.cnj.jus.br/pesquisas-judiciarias/justica-em-numeros .
Decreto-Lei nº 5.452, de 1º de maio de 1943. (1943). Aprova a Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho. Recuperado de: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del5452.htm
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1-37.
Feldmann, H. (2009). The unemployment effects of labor regulation around the world. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(1), 76-90.
Filgueiras, V.A., Lima, U.M., & Souza, I.F. (2019). Os impactos jurídicos, econômicos e sociais das reformas trabalhistas. Caderno CRH, 32(86), 231-252.
Fundo Monetário International (FMI). (2015). Where are we headed? Perspectives on potential output. In: IMF (ed.). World economic outlook: short and long-term factors. International Monetary Fund, Washington DC, 69–110.
Galvão, A., Castro B., Krein, J.D., & Teixeira, M.O. (2019). Reforma trabalhista: precarização do trabalho e os desafios para o sindicalismo. Caderno CRH, 32(86), 253-270.
Gomes, A.O., & Guimarães, T.A. (2013). Desempenho no judiciário: conceituação, estado da arte e agenda de pesquisa. Revista de Administração Pública, 47(2), 379-401.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). (2021). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua - PNAD Contínua. Recuperado de: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/trabalho/9173-pesquisa-nacional-por-amostra-de-domicilios-continua-trimestral.html?=&t=series-historicas&utm_source=landing&utm_medium=explica&utm_campaign=desemprego
Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1993). Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Businees Review. 2-16.
Krein, J.D., Oliveira, R.V., & Filgueiras, V. (2019). A. As reformas trabalhistas: promessas e impactos na vida de quem trabalha. Caderno CRH, 32(86), 225-229.
Lei nº 13.467, de 13 de julho de 2017. (2017). Altera a Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho (CLT). Recuperado de: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2017/lei/l13467.htm
Martins, R.A., & Costa Neto, P.L.O. (1998). Indicadores de desempenho para a gestão pela qualidade total: uma proposta de sistematização. Gestão & Produção, 5(3), 298-311.
Nickell, S., Nunziata, L., & Ochel, W. (2005). Unemployment in the OECD since the 1960s. What do we know?. The Economic Journal, 115(500), 1-27.
Oliveira, F.L., & Cunha, L.G. (2020). Os indicadores sobre o Judiciário brasileiro: limitações, desafios e o uso da tecnologia. Revista Direito GV, 16(1).
Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico (OCDE). ()2018. Relatórios econômicos OCDE: Brasil (resumo). Recuperado de: https://www.oecd.org/economy/surveys/Brazil-2018-OECD-economic-survey-overview-Portuguese.pdf
Parecer da Reforma. (2017). Comissão Especial destinada a proferir parecer ao Projeto de Lei nº 6.787, de 2016, do Poder Executivo que altera o Decreto-Lei nº 5.452, de 1º de maio de 1943. Brasília: Câmara dos Deputados, 2017. Recuperado de: https://www.camara.leg.br/proposicoesWeb/prop_mostrarintegra?codteor=1544961
Ramalho, J.R., Santos, R.S.P., & Rodrigues, I.J. (2019). Mudanças na legislação trabalhista, sindicato e empresas multinacionais. Caderno CRH, 32(86), 343-359.
Santos, A.L., & Gimenez, D.M. (2018). Desenvolvimento, competitividade e a reforma trabalhista. In: Krein, J.D., Gimenez, D.M., & Santos, A.L (orgs.). Dimensões críticas da reforma trabalhista no Brasil (pp. 29-67). Campinas: Curt Nimuendajú.
Sousa, M.M., & Guimarães, T.A. (2018). Recursos, inovação e desempenho em tribunais do trabalho no Brasil. Revista de Administração Pública, 52(3), 486-506.
Tribunal Superior do Trabalho (TST). (2018). Primeiro ano da reforma trabalhista: efeitos. Recuperado de: http://www.tst.jus.br/noticias/-/asset_publisher/89Dk/content/primeiro-ano-da-reforma-trabalhista-efeitos
Tribunal Superior do Trabalho (TST). (2021). Base de dados completa justiça trabalhista. Recuperado de: https://www.tst.jus.br/web/estatistica/vt/recebidos-e-julgados
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY AND COPYRIGHTS
I Declare that current article is original and has not been submitted for publication, in part or in whole, to any other national or international journal.
The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0) guidelines, which allows sharing (copy and distribution of the material in any medium or format) and adaptation (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, even commercially, under the terms of attribution.
Read this link for further information on how to use CC BY 3.0 properly.
