CARE AND EMOTIONS IN HOME CONFINEMENT DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4025/psicolestud.v27i0.59776Keywords:
Emotions;, parentality;, care;, pandemic.Abstract
This article problematizes through narratives of everyday care practices, the emotions that are organized around different configurations of child care in the Metropolitan area of Buenos Aires, Argentina. In doing so, the article aims to contribute to a pluralistic view of childhood and parenthood in order to consider the vast repertoire of dispositions, of being and feeling that are intertwined in family arrangements and child care. How do the interviewees re arranged the domestic care during the pandemic? What emotions and ‘rules of sentiment’ that new situation evidence? How the changes in the frontiers of inside/outside impacted in families and in personal and labor subjectivities? A first level of analysis of empirical data is structured around the modes of inhabiting the home -who lived with whom, in which type of house, with which type of use of the neighborhood- in order to reflect upon the emotional tensions, needs and strategies that emerged from the narratives.
Downloads
References
Borgeaud-GarciandiÌa, Natacha (2020). Cuidado y Responsabilidad. Estudos Avançados, 34 (98), 41-55.
Castilla, María Victoria, Kunin, Johana, Blanco Esmoris, MariÌa Florencia (2020). Pandemia y nuevas agendas de cuidados, Documento N°8 SecretariÌa de InvestigacioÌn Instituto De Altos Estudios Sociales IDAES, UNSAM.
Castilla, María Victoria (2017). Maternidad, cuidados y castigos en barrios marginales y vulnerables de Buenos Aires. Runa, 38(2), 37-51.
Comas-D’ Argemir, Dolors (2017). El Don y la Reciprocidad tienen GeÌnero: Las Bases Morales de los Cuidados. Quaderns-E, 22(2), 17-32.
Daly, Mary y Lewis, Jane (2000). The Concept of Social Care and the Analysis of Contemporary Welfare States. British Journal of Sociology, 51(2), 281-98.
De Grande, Pablo (2016). ¿Negociaciones o decisiones colectivas? Las dinámicas familiares tras la llegada de un bebé. Entramado, 12, 222-232.
Faur, Eleonor (2012). El cuidado infantil desde las perspectivas de las mujeres–madres. Un estudio en dos barrios populares del AÌrea Metropolitana de Buenos Aires. En: Esquivel, V.; Faur, E.; Jelin, E. (Eds) Las loÌgicas del cuidado infantil. Buenos Aires: IDES.
Franco Patiño, Sandra y Llobet, Valeria (2019). Los Centros de Desarrollo Infantil y los Procesos de InstitucionalizacioÌn del Cuidado de la Infancia en la provincia de Buenos Aires, en Rodríguez Gustá, Ana Laura (Ed) Marchas y contramarchas en las poliÌticas locales de geÌnero: dinaÌmicas territoriales y ciudadaniÌa de las mujeres en AmeÌrica Latina. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 59-86.
Gilligan, Carol (1982). In a Different Voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gutiérrez, María (2002). Triangular público, doméstico y privado, o ¿cómo negociar en pareja? Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 99(2), 61-85.
Han, Clara (2012). Life In Debt. Times Of Care And Violence In Neoliberal Chile. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Hesse-Biber, Sharlene Nagy y Leavy, Patricia (2008). Pushing on the Methodological Boundaries: The Growing Need for Emergent Methods Within And Across Disciplines. En Hesse-Biber, S. Y Leavy, P. (Eds.) Handbook of Emergent Methods. Nueva York: The Guilford Press, 1-16.
Hochschild, Arlie (2008). La mercantilización de la vida íntima. Apuntes de la casa y el trabajo. Madrid: Katz Editores.
Hochschild, Arlie (1975). The sociology of feeling and emotion: Selected possibilities. Sociological Inquiry, 45(2â€3), 280-307.
Hochschild, Arlie (1979). Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551-575.
Jaffe, Sarah (2021). Emotions on Strike. Dissent Magazine. https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/emotions-on-strike [30/01/2021]
Llobet, Valeria y Milanich, Nara (2018). Stratified maternity in the barrio: Mothers and children in Argentine social programs. En Rosen, Rachel y Katherine Twamley (Eds) Feminism and the Politics of Childhood. Friends or Foes? Londres: UCL Press, 154-170.
Lopez, María Pia (2020). El futuro ¿Ya llegoÌ?. En El futuro despueÌs del COVID-19. Buenos Aires: Presidencia de la Nación, 170-176.
Macdonald, Cameron (2009). What’s Culture Got to Do with It? Mothering Ideologies as Barriers to Gender Equity. en Gornick, Janet y Meyers, Marcia (eds) Gender Equality: Transforming Family Divisions of Labor. Londres: Verso, 411–34.
Miller, Pavla (2005). Useful and Priceless Children in Contemporary Welfare States. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 12(1), 3-41.
Molinier, Pascale y Matxalen Legarreta (2016). Subjetividad y Materialidad del cuidado: ética, trabajo y proyecto político. Papeles Del CEIC, 2016(1).
Murray Marjorie (2015). Back To Work? Childcare Negotiations And Intensive Mothering In Santiago De Chile. Journal Of Family Issues, 36(9), 1171–1191.
Murray, Marjorie; Sofía Bowen, Marisol Verdugo, Jona Holtmannspötter (2017). Care and Relatedness Among Rural Mapuche Women: Issues of Cariño and Empathy. Ethos, 45(3) 367–385.
Nari, Marcela (2002). Políticas de Maternidad y Maternalismo Político. Buenos Aires: Biblos.
Pautassi, Laura (2020). La crisis en la crisis: el derecho al cuidado como variable de ajuste. En Boholavsky, Juan Pablo (ed) COVID-19 y Derechos Humanos. La pandemia de la desigualdad. Buenos Aires: Biblos, 373-388.
Pink, Sarah, Horst, Heather, Postill, John, Hjorth, Larissa, Lewis, Tania y Tacchi, Jo (2016) Digital Ethnography. Principles And Practice. Londres: Sage Pub.
Tronto, Joan (1993) Moral Boundaries. A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. Londres: Routledge.
Tronto, Joan (2013). Particularisme et responsabiliteÌ relationnelle en morale: une autre approche de l’éthique globale. En Molinier, P.; Paperman, P. (Ed.) Contre l’indiffeÌrence des privilégiés. AÌ€ quoi sert le care. París: Payot & Rivages,
Zelizer, Viviana (1989). Pricing the priceless child: The changing social value of children. Princeton: University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
As opiniões emitidas, são de exclusiva responsabilidade do(s) autor(es). Ao submeterem o manuscrito ao Conselho Editorial de Psicologia em Estudo, o(s) autor(es) assume(m) a responsabilidade de não ter previamente publicado ou submetido o mesmo manuscrito por outro periódico. Em caso de autoria múltipla, o manuscrito deve vir acompanhado de autorização assinada por todos os autores. Artigos aceitos para publicação passam a ser propriedade da revista, podendo ser remixados e reaproveitados conforme prevê a licença Creative Commons CC-BY.
The opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the author (s). When submitting the manuscript to the Editorial Board of Study Psychology, the author (s) assumes responsibility for not having previously published or submitted the same manuscript by another journal. In case of multiple authorship, the manuscript must be accompanied by an authorization signed by all authors. Articles accepted for publication become the property of the journal, and can be remixed and reused as provided for in theby a license Creative Commons CC-BY.