A DECISION MAKING IN THE TREATMENT OF CHILDREN WITH ADHD INDICATORS
Abstract
The diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder - ADHD is quite complex. Contextual factors may influence it, and its treatment may involve different interventions. Institutions in several countries have promoted the participation of users in treatment decisions. In Brazil, it is provided by the Unified Health System. This study investigated the decision-making process in treating children with ADHD indicators from the perception of 8 public mental health services professionals interviewed individually. Data were examined through thematic analysis, revealing challenges related to excessive demand for services and the complexity of the diagnostic process. The involvement of users and family members in the decisions was perceived as partial, generally occurring after elaborating the therapeutic plan by the teams, and involving difficulties in communication between professionals and patients and differences of interests between children and their families. These aspects may be addressed in future studies and interventions to facilitate and improve the quality of the decision-making process in this context.
Downloads
References
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Manual diagnóstico e estatístico de transtornos mentais: DSM-5. Artmed.
Autor (2020). Dissertação de Mestrado, [Dissertação de mestrado não publicada]. Universidade [OMITIDA].
Barun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Boland, L., Graham, I. D., Légaré, F., Lewis, K., Jull, J., Shephard, A., Lawson, M. L., Davis, A., Yameogo, A., & Stacey, D. (2019). Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared-decision making: a systematic review. Implementation science, 14(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0851-5
Brinkman, W. B., Majcher, J. H., Poling, L. M., Shi, G., Zender, M., Sucharew, H., Britto, M. T., & Epstein, J. N. (2013). Shared decision-making to improve attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder care. Patient. Educ. Couns., 93(1), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.04.009
Buchanan, A. E., & Brock, D. W. (1989). Deciding for others: the ethics of surrogate decision making. Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, H., Hayes, D., Edbrooke-Childs, J., Martin, K., Chapman, L., & Wolpert, M. (2017). What approaches for promoting shared decision-making are used in child mental health? A scoping review. Clin. Psyhol. Psychother., 24(6), 1495-1511. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2106
Clark, L. A., Cuthbert, B., Lewis-Fernández, R., Narrow, W. E., & Reed, G. M. (2017). Three approaches to understanding and classifying mental disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18(2), 72-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100617727266
Coghill, D. R., Seth, S., & Matthews, K. (2014). A comprehensive assessment of memory, delay aversion, timing, inhibition, decision making and variability in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: advancing beyond the three-pathway models. Psychological medicine, 44(9), 1989-2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713002547
Connell, C. M., & Javenic, M. R. (2003). Health and human development. In R. M. Lerner, M. A. Easterbrooksc, J. Mistry, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.). Handbook of psychology: Vol. 6. Developmental psychology (Cap. 24, pp. 579-600). John Wiley & Sons.
Elwyn, G., Frosch, D., Thomson, R., Joseph-Williams, N., Lloyd, A., Kinnersley, P., Cording, E., Tomson, D., Dodd, C., Rollnick, S., & Edwards, A. (2012). Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. Journal of general internal medicine, 27(10), 1361-1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
Galanter, C. A., & Patel, V. L. (2005). Medical decision making: a selective review for child psychiatrists and psychologists. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(7), 675-689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01452.x
Hinshaw, S. P., & Scheffler, R. M. (2018). ADHD in the twenty-first century. In. Banaschewski, T., Coghill, D., & Zuddas, A. (Eds.), Oxford Textbook of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (Cap. 2, pp. 9-15). Oxford University Press.
Hughes, T. M., Merath, K., Chen, Q., Sun, S., Palmer, E., Idrees, J. J., Okunrintemi, V., Squires, M., Beal, E. W., & Pawlik, T. M. (2018). Association of shared decision-making on patient-reported health outcomes and healthcare utilization. The American Journal of Surgery, 216(1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.01.011
Kashaf, M. S., McGill, E. T., & Berger, Z. D. (2017). Shared decision-making and outcomes in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient
education and counseling, 100(12), 2159-2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.030
Klein, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic Decision Making. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50(3), 456–460. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288385
Kodjebacheva, G. D., Sabo, T., & Xiong, J. (2016). Interventions to improve child-parent-medical provider communication: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 166, 120-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.003
Krockow, E. M., Riviere, E., & Frosch, C. A. (2019). Improving shared health decision making for children and adolescents with chronic illness: A narrative literature review. Patient education and counseling, 102(4), 623-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.11.017
Larrick, R. P., & Feiler, D. C. (2015). Expertise in decision making. In G. Keren & G. Wu (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of judgement and decision making (Cap. 24, pp. 696-722). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Légaré, F., Adekpedjou, R., Stacey, D., Turcotte, S., Kryworuchko, J., Graham, I. D., Lyddiatt, A., Politi, M. C., Thomson, R., Elwyn, G., & Donner-Banzhoff, N. (2018). Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 7(7), CD006732. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4
NHS (2019). Universal personalised care: implementing the comprehensive model. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/universal-personalised-care.pdf
Portaria GM/MS 1.130, de 5 de agosto de 2015 (2015). Institui a Política Nacional de Atenção Integral à Saúde da Criança (PNAISC) no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2015/prt1130_05_08_2015.html
Rapaport, S., Leshno, M., & Fink, L. (2012). A design process for using normative models in shared decision making: a case study in the context of prenatal testing. Health Expectations, 17(6), 863-875. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12004
Scott, I. A., Soon, J., Elshaug, A. G., & Lindner, R. (2017). Countering cognitive biases in minimising low value care. Medical Journal of Australia, 206(9), 407-411. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.00999
Schwandt, H., & Wuppermann, A. (2016). The youngest get the pill: ADHD misdiagnosis in Germany, its regional correlates and international comparison. Labour Economics, 43, 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2016.05.018
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. The Guilford Press.
Wyatt, K. D., List, B., Brinkman, W. B., Lopez, G. P., Asi, N., Erwin, P., Wang, Z., Garces, J. P. D., Montori, V. M. & LeBlanc, A. (2015). Shared decision making in pediatrics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad. Pediatr., 15(6), 573-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2015.03.011
Wolraich, M. L., Hagan, J. F., Jr, Allan, C., Chan, E., Davison, D., Earls, M., Evans, S. W., Flinn, S. K., Froehlich, T., Frost, J., Holbrook, J. R., Lehmann, C. U., Lessin, H. R., Okechukwu, K., Pierce, K. L., Winner, J. D., Zurhellen, W., & Subcommittee on children and adolescents with attention-deficit/huperactive disorder (2019). Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics, 144(4), e20192528. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-2528
Copyright (c) 2024 Psicologia em Estudo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As opiniões emitidas, são de exclusiva responsabilidade do(s) autor(es). Ao submeterem o manuscrito ao Conselho Editorial de Psicologia em Estudo, o(s) autor(es) assume(m) a responsabilidade de não ter previamente publicado ou submetido o mesmo manuscrito por outro periódico. Em caso de autoria múltipla, o manuscrito deve vir acompanhado de autorização assinada por todos os autores. Artigos aceitos para publicação passam a ser propriedade da revista, podendo ser remixados e reaproveitados conforme prevê a licença Creative Commons CC-BY.
The opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the author (s). When submitting the manuscript to the Editorial Board of Study Psychology, the author (s) assumes responsibility for not having previously published or submitted the same manuscript by another journal. In case of multiple authorship, the manuscript must be accompanied by an authorization signed by all authors. Articles accepted for publication become the property of the journal, and can be remixed and reused as provided for in theby a license Creative Commons CC-BY.
