<b>Gender differences in pay in the Brazilian public sector between 2002 and 2015: extent, trends, and explanations

  • Daniela Verzola Vaz Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Keywords: public sector employment, human capital, labor market, Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition, Ñopo decomposition, Brazil

Abstract

 This paper studies the gender pay gap in the Brazilian public sector between 2002 and 2015. Blinder-Oaxaca methodology is applied to decompose the wage gap in the part explained by measurable characteristics ― such as differences in workers´ productive endowments or in their occupational distribution ― and a residual component, caused by different returns to these characteristics. The decomposition is applied to all PNAD between 2002 and 2015, but it is discussed in more detail for 2015. For this year a non-parametric alternative proposed by Ñopo (2008) is also applied. The Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition shows that the share of the residual component in the wage gap increased from 45.3% in 2002 to 55.5% in 2015. Ñopo technique indicates that about 54% of the wage gap cannot be attributed to differences in the distributions of individuals’ characteristics, but rather to the unexplained fraction, in 2015. Thus, even controlling for observable characteristics of the labor force, there remains a gender wage gap, whose size suffered no reduction during the analysis period. The most important factors in explaining such difference are age and weekly working hours.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Daniela Verzola Vaz, Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Professora Adjunta da Escola Paulista de Política, Economia e Negócios da Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPPEN-UNIFESP, Campus Osasco). Bacharel (2002), Mestre (2005) e Doutora (2010) em Ciência Econômica pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
Published
2018-09-19
How to Cite
Vaz, D. V. (2018). <b&gt;Gender differences in pay in the Brazilian public sector between 2002 and 2015: extent, trends, and explanations. Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences, 40(2), e41507. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihumansoc.v40i2.41507
Section
Economy