<b>Counselling letters: a dialogical space for the self's social construction</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v34i2.15076

  • Maria do Socorro de Almeida Farias-Marques Universidade Federal do Pampa
  • Vera Lúcia Pires Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis
Keywords: discursive genre, ethos, media, rates of modalization, social relation of gender

Abstract

The aim of this work is analyze the rates of modalization in the discursive genre advice letter, in order to observe how they help in the construction of self image. We are interested in the analysis of images that the authors of letters build in their discourses. As second objective, we intend to verify if the discourses of the letters break with the traditional stereotype of female figure and its social role or pointed traditional roles. The corpus of that work is compound for six advice letters published in the column Consultório Sentimental of Veja.com Magazine and signed by the columnist Betty Milan (2007a, b and c). The analysis is made based in the rules of Bakhtin about the genres of discourse, the notion of ethos discoursed by Amossy (2005) and Maingueneau (2005, 2008) and of Kerbrat-Orecchioni (1986) about the rates of modalization. The studies of Bakhtin were used to analyze the advice letters while genre of discourse, considering theirs constituents (theme, style, and composition) and theirs authors. As the studies about media and social construction of genre, we intend to point the role of media in the spread of social roles of women and men in social relations. These are built in the interaction among women, men and society.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Published
2012-08-10
How to Cite
Farias-Marques, M. do S. de A., & Pires, V. L. (2012). <b>Counselling letters: a dialogical space for the self’s social construction</b&gt; - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v34i2.15076. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 34(2), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v34i2.15076
Section
Linguistics

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus