<b>Negative constructions in the speech of residents of the rural area of Piranga, Minas Gerais State: a variational analysis</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v34i2.15149

  • Vivian Canella Seixas Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
  • Mônica Guieiro Ramalho de Alkmim Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
  • Elaine Chaves Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Keywords: negative constructions, linguistic variation, change in progress, sociolinguistics, mineiro dialect

Abstract

This paper aims to describe and to analyze negative constructions in the speech of residents of the rural area of Piranga, Minas Gerais State. The selected constructions were: [Não V], [Não V Não] and [V Não]. The theoretical framework used to perform the work was the Quantitative Sociolinguistics. For purposes of description, we used two external factors: sex and age. From the corpus analysis and the comparison with other works about the negatives in the Mineiro Dialect - Camargos (1998), Alkmim (2001) and Sousa (2004) - it was found that the innovative variants [Não V Não] and [V não] present a profile of a possible change in progress and that males would be taking forward this change.

 


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Vivian Canella Seixas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
Mestranda em Letras - Estudos da Linguagem pela Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
Mônica Guieiro Ramalho de Alkmim, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
Doutora em Estudos Linguísticos pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais; Professora adjunta da Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto.
Elaine Chaves, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Doutoranda em Estudos Linguísticos pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Published
2012-08-10
How to Cite
Seixas, V. C., Alkmim, M. G. R. de, & Chaves, E. (2012). <b>Negative constructions in the speech of residents of the rural area of Piranga, Minas Gerais State: a variational analysis</b&gt; - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v34i2.15149. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 34(2), 269-276. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v34i2.15149
Section
Linguistics

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus