<b>Textbooks of religious education: polemics composing analysis at media discourse</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v34i2.16127

  • Bruno Sampaio Garrido Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (Unesp)
Keywords: discursive relations, global semantics, journalism, teaching material, religious education

Abstract

This text aims to identify the discursive relations and the mechanisms used by sources – discourses gathered at press and specialized sites – in composing of viewpoints presented about the religious education textbooks and, a result of that, of controversial relationship built thereafter. The theoretical foundation of this work rests largely on the concepts of global semantics and constitutive intermisunderstanding (MAINGUENEAU, 1997, 2008) and discursive heterogeneity (AUTHIER-REVUZ, 1990, 1998). The research corpus consisted of four texts, three of which were published in 2010 and another in 2011, two reports and two opinion articles about the subject. From our analysis, we could see the construction of a controversial relationship between a discursive formation that challenges the teaching of religion in Brazilian public education, on the grounds that benefit the Christian faith and, moreover, one that supports the continuation of this practice and consider it important for the formation of the student and also as a promoter of diversity and equality.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Bruno Sampaio Garrido, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (Unesp)
Jornalista, Mestre em Comunicação pela Unesp de Bauru, Doutorando em Linguística e Língua Portuguesa pela Unesp de Araraquara. Assistente de Suporte Acadêmico do Departamento de Psicologia da Unesp de Bauru
Published
2012-08-10
How to Cite
Garrido, B. S. (2012). <b>Textbooks of religious education: polemics composing analysis at media discourse</b&gt; - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v34i2.16127. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 34(2), 207-215. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v34i2.16127
Section
Linguistics

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus