Identity multiplicity in ‘Galileia’, by Ronaldo Correia de Brito: homosexual representation x sertaneja representation

  • Daniela Sousa da Rocha Universidade Estadual do Piauí
Keywords: memory; identity; culture; mystery; Neoregionalism

Abstract

As part of the research carried out by the research group NENIN - Nucleus for Studies in Neoregionalism, Imaginary and Narrativity, the research aims to analyze the relationship between the homosexual identity of the character Davi and the country identity pertaining to his family in the literary work ‘Galilee’, by Ronaldo Correia de Brito. According to Michael Pollak (1992), throughout life we build an image of ourselves and others representing what we believe we are. However, for homosexual subjects, the creation of this image often ends up having the intention of hiding this particularity. According to Trevisan (2000), assuming this identity category is assuming all the negative charge that accompanies it. It was found that the idea of belonging to a group related to the character David, in this case his own family, does not contrast so much with his homosexual individuality, because, even though it does not correspond to what this group imagines for him, it ends up bringing them together through David's keeping it a secret, which is a common custom in that family. However, the transformations in the sertanejo scenario, as well as changes in customs in the region, may have reduced this opposition. It is a qualitative research based on theorists such as Brito (2017), Pollak (1992), Ricoeur (2007, 2014) Trevisan (2000) and analysis of the literary work in question.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Published
2021-12-01
How to Cite
Rocha, D. S. da. (2021). Identity multiplicity in ‘Galileia’, by Ronaldo Correia de Brito: homosexual representation x sertaneja representation. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 43(2), e58450. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v43i2.58450
Section
Chamada Temática - Literatura

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus