A multimodal proposal for analysing narratives: gesture and eye-gaze in mental spaces marking

Keywords: narrativa; gestos; direção do olhar; espaços mentais.

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to investigate, in multimodal data, the role of gesture and eye-gaze in Mental Spaces marking in narrative occurrences of Brazilian Portuguese. For this purpose, three excerpts from a personal narrative given by the Brazilian actress Marisa Orth, on GNT network TV Show ‘Que história é essa, Porchat?’ (How come, Porchat?) (Canal GNT, 2019), were selected from Youtube. In order to support the discussions theoretically, first, the relationship between mental spaces and multimodal articulators, gestures and the eye-gaze (Sweetser & Stec, 2016), was described and explained. In addition, it was presented the articulation between hand gestures and the marking of narrative levels – narrative, metanarrative and paranarrative – , as well as the marking of narrative viewpoints - the character viewpoint (C-VPT) and the observer viewpoint (O-VPT). Methodologically, we have analysed the lexical choices made on each occurrence (Dancygier, 2011), and then proceeded to the analysis of hand gestures, based on the identification and description of gestural strokes of the Linguistic Annotation System for Gestures (LASG) (Bressem, Ladewig, & Müller, 2013). The direction and function of the gaze in interactional contexts were also analysed. Finally, quantitative data on the duration of eye-gaze were described and interpreted. Results show that gestures and eye-gaze can both mark the same Mental Space (the Ground or the Narrative Space), as well as can simultaneously mark different Mental Spaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Published
2023-06-07
How to Cite
Lisboa, A., & Avelar, M. (2023). A multimodal proposal for analysing narratives: gesture and eye-gaze in mental spaces marking. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 45(1), e64489. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v45i1.64489
Section
Linguistics

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus