The functioning of misconception in the literary discurse: literal and(is) metaphorical in the short story O homem podre by Natália Borges Polesso

Keywords: literary discourse; aesthetic discursive formation (ADF); no-sens; real of the language.

Abstract

In this article, affiliated with the Discourse Analysis founded by Michel Pêcheux, we propose to analyze the short story O homem podre, by Natália Borges Polesso (2018), a contemporary Brazilian writer, thinking of literary discourse as the place where the ‘semantically normal world' is suspended and gives space to misconception, absurdity and non-sens. Therefore, we articulate to the theoretical assumptions of D.A the concept of aesthetic revolution, as thought by Jacques Rancière, in order to configure what we call Aesthetic Discursive Formation (ADF), a region of interdiscourse whose prototypical knowledge revolves around the dismantling of the illusion of transparency and unity. The pendulum process between theory and corpus proper to the analytical procedures of discourse theory showed that, in the short story under analysis, the effect of questioning the evidence is related to the equivocal game between the literal, the metaphorical and the metonymic. In the text, the literal arises in the place where the metaphorical is commonly expected, in order to implode the barriers between what would be the ‘legitimate’ meaning of a given word or utterance and the meaning taken in common sense as marginal. This aesthetic procedure captures the real of the language, always hidden in other discursive formations, which unfolds in a transgressive power typical of the artistic and the literary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Published
2023-06-01
How to Cite
Brum, J. C. (2023). The functioning of misconception in the literary discurse: literal and(is) metaphorical in the short story O homem podre by Natália Borges Polesso. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 45(1), e64620. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v45i1.64620
Section
Linguistics

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus