Moral conflicts of recognition of colonialism in O mandarim, by Eça de Queiroz

  • Silvana Seabra Hooper Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie / Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
Keywords: Eça de Queiroz; O mandarim; mundialization; imperialism; literature.

Abstract

The work analyzes the short story O mandarim, by Eça de Queiroz, as a marker of the ambivalence, at the end of the 19th century, between the world order of imperialism and the guidelines of an expanded imagination of human universality. Eça de Queiroz starts from an old philosophical question, under the title ‘the mandarin's dilemma’, which proposes that distance in time and space is proportionally inverse to human indifference towards suffering and pain. Starting from cultural studies and social history, the article proposes a more detailed reading of the work, not only as a reflection of an economic and social process, but also as a constructor of a form of awareness through fictionality. This aspect is also discussed by the authors Lynn Hunt, historian, and Martha Nussbaum, philosopher, both dedicated to the problem of the emotional effects of 17th and 18th century novels for the institution of human morality in what concerns the notion of modern equality. Under this theme, the concepts of sympathy or empathy emerge, which, even though already consolidated in social psychology, are still fragile in the scope of social and literary studies. By bringing them to the analysis of O mandarim, we show that Eça's apparently simple work can be problematized in symbolic social proportions, which move from the narrative placed in individual terms to considerations about expanded places and formations, such as the relationship between West and East. At the same time as it proposes questions of a more generic nature, the text also highlights the identity condition of Portugal at the time of Eça's writing, suggesting a more complex plot as the backdrop to the fiction of O mandarim.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Referências

Al-Azm, S. J. (2000). Orientalism and orientalismo reverse. In A. L. Macfie (Ed.), Orientalism: a reader (p. 217-238). New York, NY: New York University Press.

Baker, G. (2020). Realism's Empire: empiricism and enchantment in the nineteenth-century novel. Athens, OH: Ohio State University Press.

Balzac, H. (2015). O Pai Goriot. São Paulo, SP: Penguin.

Berrini, B. (1992). Introdução. In E. Queirós, O mandarim (p. 1569). Lisboa, PT: Imprensa Nacional-Casa da Moeda.

Bleiker, R. (2009). Aesthetics and world politics. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Brewster, S., & Thurston, L. (2018). Introduction. In S. Brewster, & L. Thurston (Eds.), The Routledge handbook to the ghost story. New York, NY: Routlegde.

Brooks, P. (2005). Realist vision. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Carey, B. (2005). British Abolitionism and the rhetoric of sensibility: writing, sentiment, and slavery, 1760-1807. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Carey, B., Ellis, M., & Salih, S. (2004). Discourses of slavery and abolition: writing in britain and its colonies 1660-1832. London, UK: Palgrave.

Casanova, P. A. (2002). República mundial das letras. São Paulo, SP: Estação Liberdade.

Clifford, J. (1980). Review of orientalism - Edward W. Said. History and Theory, 19(2), 204-223.

Conrad, J. (2002a). Coração das trevas. São Paulo, SP: Abril/Controljornal.

Conrad, J. (2002b). Lord Jim. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Editora Revan.

Costa Lima, L. (2003). O redemunho do horror. São Paulo, SP: Editora Planeta.

Damrosch, D. (2003). What is world literature? Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.

Eagleton, T. (2009). Trouble with strangers: a study of ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Press.

Elias, N. (2011). O processo civilizador: uma história dos costumes. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Zahar.

Febvre, L. (1985). A sensibilidade e a história. In L. Febvre, Combates pela história (p. 217-232). Lisboa, PT: Presença.

Foucault, M. (2013). O Corpo utópico, as heterotopias. São Paulo, SP: n-1 Edições.

Freud, S. (1919). O estranho. In S. Freud, Obras psicológicas completas (Vol. 17, p. 275-314). Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Imago.

Ginzburg, C. (2011). Matar um mandarim chinês. As implicações morais da distância. In C. Ginzburg, Olhos de madeira: nove reflexões sobre a distância (p. xx-xx). São Paulo, SP: Companhia das Letras.

Hayot, E. (2009). The hypothetical mandarin: sympathy, modernity, and chinese pain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Huizinga, J. (1985). O outono da idade média. Lisboa, PT: Ulisses.

Hunt, L. (1992a). A nova história cultural. São Paulo, SP: Martins Fontes.

Hunt, L. (1992b). The family romance of the french revolution. Oakland, CA: University Califórnia Press.

Hunt, L. (2009). A invenção dos direitos humanos: uma história. São Paulo, SP: Companhia das Letras.

Levinas, E. (2008). Totalidade e infinito. Coimbra, PT: Edições 70.

Lewis, B. (1982). The question of orientalism. New York Review of Books. Recuperado de https://motherfoucaultsreadinggroup.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/the-question-of-orientalism.pdf

Lewis, M. (2016). Self-conscious emotions: embarrassment, pride, shame, guilt, and hubris. In M. Lewis, Handbook of emoticons (p. 792-814). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Lourenço, E. (2001). A náu de Ícaro. São Paulo, SP: Companhia da Letras.

Lourenço, E. (1991). O labirinto da saudade. Lisboa, SP: Tinta da China.

Martins, A. C. (1967). O mandarim assassinado. In A. C. Martins, Ensaios Queirosianos (p. 10-266). Lisboa, PT: Europa-América.

Moretti, F. (2003). Atlas do romance europeu: 1800-1900. São Paulo, SP: Boitempo.

Nussbaum, M. (1991). The literary imagination in public life. New Literary History, 22(4), 877-910.

Poetic world politics. (2000). Alternatives: Social Transformation and Humane Governance, 25(3), 269-413.

Popper, K. R. (2001). A lógica da pesquisa científica. São Paulo, SP: Cultrix.

Queiroz, E. (2012). O mandarim. São Paulo, SP: Tordesilhas.

Reddy, W. M. (2004). The Navigation of feeling: a framework for the history of emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ribeiro, M. C. (2002). Empire, Colonial wars and post-colonialism in portuguese contemporary imagination. Portuguese Studies, 17(1), 132-214.

Said, E. W. (2011). Cultura e imperialismo. São Paulo, SP: Companhia das Letras

Said, E. W. (1990). Orientalismo: o oriente como invenção do ocidente. São Paulo, SP: Companhia das Letras.

Santos, B. S. (2002). Entre Próspero e Caliban: colonialismo, pós-colonialismo e inter-identidade. Luso-Brazilian Review, 39(2), 9-43.

Santos, B. S. (1993). Modernidade, identidade e a cultura de fronteira. Tempo Social, 5(1-2), 31-52.

Sivan, E. (1997). Orientalism polemics. Recuperado de https://in.bgu.ac.il/en/heksherim/2005/Orientalism-Polemics.pdf

Taylor, C. (1997). As fontes do self. São Paulo, SP: Editora Loyola.

The aesthetic turn in international political theory. (2001). Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30(3), 509-894.

Todd, J. M. (1986). Sensibility an introduction. London, UK: Methuen Press.

Wallerstein, I. (1999). Análise dos sistemas mundiais. In A. Giddens, & J. Turner (Orgs.), Teoria social hoje (p. 447-470). São Paulo, SP: Editora da UNESP.

Watt, I. (1990). A ascensão do romance: estudos sobre Defoe, Richardson e Fielding. São Paulo, SP: Companhia das Letras.

Young, R. (1990). White mythologies. London, UK: Routledge.

Published
2024-08-08
How to Cite
Hooper, S. S. (2024). Moral conflicts of recognition of colonialism in O mandarim, by Eça de Queiroz. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 46(2), e69623. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v46i2.69623
Section
Literature

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus