Use of educational material in promoting the functionality of preterm children: feasibility study
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a research protocol on the effects of the educational technology "History of Sofia" in the promotion of functional skills of preterm infants. Method: Controlled, randomized and single-blinded feasibility study, carried out in a follow-up service in the Mata Mineira Zone. The intervention group (GI) received printed educational material, and the control group (CG), guidance with the Children’s Book. The child’s functionality was evaluated in three moments with the Pediatric Disability Assessment Inventory (PEDI). Indicators of feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy were analyzed. Results: Of the 120 potential participants, 39 families were contacted, 19 agreed to participate (48.72%) and 6 completed all phases (31.58%). All caregivers understood the material and reported improvements in child care. GI showed a significant increase in functional mobility skills after two months (p=0.02), but the gain was not maintained. There were no significant differences between groups. Barriers, such as outdated medical records and lack of funding, made recruitment difficult. Final thoughts: The educational material had good acceptance, with positive preliminary effects. Active methodologies, extended follow-up and evaluation of emotional and relational impacts in future research are recommended.
Downloads
References
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. DATASUS. Tabnet. Nascimentos por ocorrência segundo duração da gestação. Ministério da Saúde [on-line], 2023 [citado em 16 nov 2025]. Disponível em: URL: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sinasc/cnv/nvuf.def.
Araujo JC, Mendonça LF, Costa PH, Shimasaki, KHDC, Moreira GB, Oliveira Júnior MDD, et al. Efeitos da prematuridade no desenvolvimento infantil. Braz J Implantol and Health Sci 2024; 6(5), 1135-1145. Doi: https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-8169.2024v6n5p1135-1145.
Jin JH; Lee SH, Youk TM, Yoon SW. Long-term outcomes of preterm infants in the first 6 years of life: a nationwide population-based study in Korea. Eur J Pediatr. 2023; 182(2), 641-650. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04728-w.
Taylor GL, O'Shea TM. Extreme prematurity: risk and resiliency. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2022; 52(2), 101132. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cppeds.2022.101132
Sacchi C, O'Muircheartaigh J, Batalle D, Counsell SJ, Simonelli A, Cesano M et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes following intrauterine growth restriction and very preterm birth. J Pediatr. 2021; 238, 135-144. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.07.002.
Nivins S, Padilla N, Hedvig K, Ådén U. Gestational Age and Cognitive Development in Childhood. JAMA Netw Open 2025; 8(4), e254580-e254580. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4580.
Farias MFR, Ferreira LD, Miranda NA, Oliveira JPDM. Efeito do nascimento prematuro no desenvolvimento motor, comportamento e desempenho de crianças em idade escolar: revisão sistemática. J Arch Health 2024; 5(3), e2307-e2307. Doi: https://doi.org/10.46919/archv5n3espec-614.
Sandoval CC, Gaspardo CM, Linhares MBM. Função executiva em crianças nascidas pré-termo na fase pré-escolar. Rev Psicol Plural 2022; 1(e022008):1-24. Doi: https://doi.org/10.59099/prpub.2022.18
Lock N, Deboer MD, Scharf RJ, Miller SE. Academic performance in moderately and late preterm children in the United States: are they catching up?. J Perinatol. 2024; 44(6), 819-826. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-01938-y.
Lemos RA, Veríssimo MDLÓR. Functional development of preterm infants: an integrative literature review. Fisioter Mov. 2016; 29(3), 623-633. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5918.029.003.AO20.
Frantz MF, Schaefer MP, Donelli TMS. Follow-Up de Nascidos Prematuros: Uma Revisão Sistemática da Literatura. Psicol teor pesqui 2021; 37(e37316), 1-13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e37316.
Ulvund SE. Early intervention in families with preterm infants: a review of findings from a randomized controlled trial following children up to 9 years of age. Children (Basel). 2022; 9(4), 474. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/children9040474.
Silva FB, Gondim EC, Henrique NCP, Fonseca LMM, Mello DFD. Intervenção educativa com mães jovens: aquisição de saberes sobre cuidados da criança. Acta Paul Enferm. 2018; 31(1), 32-38. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201800006
Lemos RA, Veríssimo MDLÓR. História de Sofia: Batalhas e Conquistas da família no cuidado e desenvolvimento da criança prematura. 1ª ed. São Paulo: Richard Veiga, 2016 [citado em 03 jul. 2025]. Disponível em: URL: https://www.ee.usp.br/cartilhas/historiadeSofia.pdf
World Health Organization. ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics - Version 01/2023; 2023 [acesso em: 03 jul. 2025]. Disponível em: URL: https://icd.who.int/browse/2025-01/mms/en#2041060050.
Lemos RA, Veríssimo MDLÓR. Methodological strategies for the elaboration of educational material: focus on the promotion of preterm infants’ development. Cienc Saude Colet. 2020; 25(2), 505-518. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020252.04052018.
Mancini MC. Inventário da avaliação pediátrica de incapacidade (PEDI): Manual da versão brasileira adaptada. 1ª ed. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 2005.
Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa (ABEP). Critério Brasil
[citado em 03 jul. 2025]. Disponível em: URL: http://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil.
Sidani S, Braden CJ. Nursing and health interventions: design, evaluation, and implementation. 2ª ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2021.
Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(5), 452-457. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002
Santos JS, Dutra LP, Santana JLD, Leite LS, Filgueiras ÍTC, Rodrigues TD et al. Habilidade motora grossa em lactentes prematuros segundo a Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Fisioter Bras 2021; 22(1), 10-24. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33233/fb.v22i1.4191.
Santos LS, Soria LCM, Santos JS, Antoniucci JM, Rodrigues OMPR. Análise dos marcos do desenvolvimento em prematuros utilizando a Escala Bayley. Fisioter Bras 2021; 22(5), 637-648. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33233/fb.v22i5.4601.
Pinto, RB, Cardoso, CDNA, Costa, RDJPD, Portal, PSC, Guimarães, SDSDV, Barreiros, MDP. Strategies for coping with patient absenteeism in consultations and examinations scheduled by health systems: an integrative review. Res Soc Dev 2021, 10(7), 127-150. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i7.16671.
Rodrigues JCDL, Gaspardo CM, Linhares MBM. Development of neonatal high-risk preterm infants in comparison to full-term counterparts. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2022; 11(4), e46210716671. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2021.1988601.
Draper CE, Galasso E, Dinsa G, Black MM. The next 1000 days: Building on early investments for the health and development of young children. The Lancet 2024, 404, 2094–2116. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01389-8
Nores M, Behrman JT, Yousafzai AK. The cost of not investing in the next 1000 days: Implications for policy and practice. The Lancet 2024, 404, 2117–2130. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01390-4
Silva FB, Gaíva MAM. Preenchimento da caderneta de saúde da criança: percepção dos profissionais. Ciênc cuid saúde 2015; 14(2), 1027-1034. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4025/ciencuidsaude.v14i2.24268.
Celuppi, IC, Mohr, ETB, Felisberto, M, Rodrigues, TS, Hammes, JF, Cunha, CL et al. Dez anos do Prontuário Eletrônico do Cidadão e-SUS APS: em busca de um Sistema Único de Saúde eletrônico. Rev saúde pública 2024, 58, 23. Doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005770.
Greenup, EP, Best, D. Systematic review and meta-analysis of no show or non-attendance rates among telehealth and in-person models of care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025, 25(1), 1-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12826-2.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ciência, Cuidado e Saúde
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
