PSYCHOANALITIC CONSIDERATIONS ON DIFFICULTIES OF THE METHODOLOGY IN THE SCIENCES THAT DEAL WITH SUBJECTS
Abstract
This text is based on the confirmation, in the history of sciences and philosophy, about the substandard condition of our sensorial and cognitive tools for apprehension of the essence of the objects and the consequent importance of carefully studying the way you try this apprehension. Using psychoanalytic concepts, it considers the difficulties and the illusion which sustain the methodological discussions and the impacts of those discussions, mainly in the field of the sciences that address the subjectivity, referring to a single individual or to the collective. Initially addressing the psychoanalysis, the work proposes that its method corresponds to the transfer, which emphasizes ambiguity of the method, as it is both what enables the process and also what is presented as its greater obstacle. The resistance, in this sense, both from the analyst and from the analyzer would be the most evident sign of the character of imprisonment that the method represents for the emergency of the subject, which is the main purpose of the process. Hence, we consider that this discussion could be extrapolated to the general human sciences, where similar hindrances could be found. In the end, compliant with the anthropologist Viveiros de Castro, a methodology is proposed which should be processed in movement, in transformation, where the essence of what is sought is found on the novelty that causes the applied method to become uncertain.Downloads
References
BADIOU, A. (2006). Logiques des mondes. Paris: Seuil.
CASTRO, E. V. (2012). “Transformação” na antropologia, transformação da “antropologia”. Mana, 18(1), 151-71. Recuperado em 30 de maio, de 2016, de: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-93132012000100006
CURZ, J. A. (2012). Considerações sobre o(s) tempo(s) na direção da análise: um percurso na clínica psicanalítica em Freud e Lacan. Dissertação de mestrado Não-Publicada, Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis. Recuperado em 30 de maio, de 2016, de: https://repositorio.ufsc.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/103432/316855.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
DAVID-MÉNARD, M. (2015). Método psicanálitico e vida pulsional (Trad. B. Chnaiderman). Lacuna: uma revista de psicanálise, 0, não paginado. Recuperado em 30 de maio, de 2016, de: https://revistalacuna.com/2015/09/29/metodo-psicanalitico-e-vida-pulsional/
DESCARTES, R. (2007). Regras para a orientação do espírito (2a ed.). (M. E. Galvão, Trad.). São Paulo: Martins Fontes. (Original publicado em 1628-29).
LACAN, J. (1971/2003). Lituraterra. In Outros escritos (pp. 15-25). Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar
LAVENDHOMME, R. (2001). Lieux du sujet : psychanalyse et mathématique. Paris: Seuil.
ZIZEK, S. (2011, 23 de março). L’inconscient, c’est la politique. Conferência realizada na University of Leeds, Leeds, Reino Unido. Recuperado em 30 de maio, de 2016, de: http://colblog.blog.lemonde.fr/2011/09/01/slavoj-zizek-linconscient-cest-la-politique/#more-1354
ZIZEK, S. (2016, 03 de fevereiro). A necessidade de atravessar a fantasia (D. A. Teixeira, Trad.). Lavrapalavra, não paginado. Recuperado em 30 de maio, de 2016, de: https://lavrapalavra.com/2016/02/03/a-necessidade-de-atravessar-a-fantasia/
SANTOS, M. (2000). O papel ativo da geografia um manifesto. Revista Território, V(9), 103-09. Recuperado em 30 de maio, de 2016, de: http://www.revistaterritorio.com.br/pdf/09_7_santos.pdf
As opiniões emitidas, são de exclusiva responsabilidade do(s) autor(es). Ao submeterem o manuscrito ao Conselho Editorial de Psicologia em Estudo, o(s) autor(es) assume(m) a responsabilidade de não ter previamente publicado ou submetido o mesmo manuscrito por outro periódico. Em caso de autoria múltipla, o manuscrito deve vir acompanhado de autorização assinada por todos os autores. Artigos aceitos para publicação passam a ser propriedade da revista, podendo ser remixados e reaproveitados conforme prevê a licença Creative Commons CC-BY.
The opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the author (s). When submitting the manuscript to the Editorial Board of Study Psychology, the author (s) assumes responsibility for not having previously published or submitted the same manuscript by another journal. In case of multiple authorship, the manuscript must be accompanied by an authorization signed by all authors. Articles accepted for publication become the property of the journal, and can be remixed and reused as provided for in theby a license Creative Commons CC-BY.
