COGNICIÓN SOCIAL Y SALUD MENTAL: LA ‘LECTURA DE LA MENTE’ EN LA ASSISTENCIA A SALUD
Resumen
Teoría de la mente es la capacidad sociocognitiva de inferir pensamientos, sentimientos e intenciones. Es una habilidad que apoya las relaciones sociales y parece particularmente relevante para el ejercicio de determinadas actividades que están vinculadas a ‘leer al otro’, como la práctica de los profesionales que brindan atención en equipos de salud, como ocurre en los Centros de Atención Psicosocial. Este estudio teórico tuvo como objetivo analizar la importancia de las habilidades socio-cognitivas para el trabajo en salud, especialmente en salud mental, buscando identificar y discutir posibles factores que pueden incidir en la inferencia que hacen los profesionales sobre lo que piensan, sienten o sienten los usuarios del servicio. El análisis permitió observar las formas en que la teoría de la mente puede convertirse en una herramienta importante para los profesionales en el proceso terapéutico. Además, se pudo identificar que, en el formato en el que se ha operado actualmente, el trabajo en Centros de Atención Psicosocial ha expuesto a los profesionales a diversos estresores que parecen afectar sus habilidades sociocognitivas, los cuales pueden perjudicar no solo su salud sino también el ejercicio del cuidado.
Descargas
Citas
Apperly, I. A., Back, E., Samson, D., & France, L. (2007). The cost of thinking about false beliefs: Evidence from adults’ performance on a non-inferential theory of mind task. Cognition, 106(3), 1093–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.005
Ávila, R. F., Morais, D., Bomfim, A. J., & Chagas, M. H. N. (2016). Empatia e reconhecimento de expresses faciais de emoções básicas e complexas em estudantes de Medicina. Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria, 65(3), 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1590/0047-2085000000126
Bellenzani, R., Paro, D. M., & Oliveira, M. C. (2016). Trabalho em Saúde Mental e Estresse na Equipe: Questões para a Política Nacional de Humanização/SUS. Revista Psicologia e Saúde, 1(8), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.20435/2177093x2016105
Bourke, M. E., & Grenyer, B. F. S. (2017). Therapists’ metacognitive monitoring of the psychotherapeutic process with patients with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 23(4), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000247
Brasil. (2004). Saúde Mental no SUS: Os Centros de Atenção Psicossocial (Primeira e). Brasília, DF.
Brasil. (2010). Acolhimento nas práticas de produção de saúde (Segunda ed). Brasília, DF.
Brent, B. K. (2015). A mentalization-based approach to the development of the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22150
Bull, R., Phillips, L. H., & Conway, C. A. (2008). The role of control functions in mentalizing: Dual-task studies of Theory of Mind and executive function. Cognition, 107(2), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.015
Caixeta, L., & Nitrini, R. (2002). Teoria da Mente: Uma Revisão com Enfoque na sua Incorporação pela Psicologia Médica. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 15(1), 105–112.
Cologon, J., Schweitzer, R. D., King, R., & Nolte, T. (2017). Therapist Reflective Functioning, Therapist Attachment Style and Therapist Effectiveness. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 44(5), 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-017-0790-5
Ferreira, N. N., & Lucca, S. R. (2015). Síndrome de burnout em técnicos de enfermagem de um hospital público do estado de são paulo. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 18(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5497201500010006
Fonagy, P., & Allison, E. (2014). The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy, 51(3), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036505
German, T. P., & Hehman, J. A. (2006). Representational and executive selection resources in “theory of mind”: Evidence from compromised belief-desire reasoning in old age. Cognition, 101(1), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.05.007
Keysar, B., Lin, S., & Barr, D. J. (2003). Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00064-7
Kosmidis, M. H., Giannakou, M., Garyfallos, G., Kiosseoglou, G., & Bozikas, V. P. (2011). The impact of impaired “Theory of Mind” on social interactions in schizophrenia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(3), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617711000300
Ma, W., Sai, L., Tay, C., Du, Y., Jiang, J., & Ding, X. P. (2019). Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder’s Lying is Correlated with Their Working Memory But Not Theory of Mind. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(8), 3364–3375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04018-9
Martins, C., Barreto, A. L., & Castiajo, P. (2014). Teoria da mente ao longo do desenvolvimento normativo: Da idade escolar até à idade adulta. Analise Psicologica, 31(4), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.14417/S0870-8231201300040002
Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., & Harris-Waller, J. (2014). Is mind-mindedness trait-like or a quality of close relationships? Evidence from descriptions of significant others, famous people, and works of art. Cognition, 130(3), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.009
Music, G. (2017). NHS MENTAL HEALTH STAFF: SECURELY ATTACHED OR UNDER ATTACK? Healthcare Counselling & Psychotherapy Journal, 17(3), 14–17. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pbh&AN=124423166&lang=es&site=ehost-live
Owens, K. A., Haddock, G., & Berry, K. (2013). The role of the therapeutic alliance in the regulation of emotion in psychosis: An attachment perspective. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 20(6), 523–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1793
Panciera, S. D. P., & Zeller, A. C. (2018). Teoria da mente e habilidades sociais: estudo com crianças pré-escolares. Psico, 49(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2018.2.28190
Pinkham, A. E., Penn, D. L., Green, M. F., Buck, B., Healey, K., & Harvey, P. D. (2014). The social cognition psychometric evaluation study: Results of the expert survey and RAND Panel. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(4), 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbt081
Qureshi, A. W., Monk, R. L., Samson, D., & Apperly, I. A. (2020). Does interference between self and other perspectives in theory of mind tasks reflect a common underlying process? Evidence from individual differences in theory of mind and inhibitory control. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 27(1), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01656-z
Şencan, B. (2019). Theory of Mind in Major Depressive Disorder. Psikiyatride Guncel Yaklasimlar - Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 11(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.383349
Smeets, T., Dziobek, I., & Wolf, O. T. (2009). Social cognition under stress: Differential effects of stress-induced cortisol elevations in healthy young men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 55(4), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.01.011
Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development, 75(2), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00691.x
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.25226
Yerushalmi, H. (2017). Creative Solutions and Development for Social Workers Treating People with Serious Mental Illness - Contributions from Supervision. Journal of Social Work Practice, 31(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2016.1253004
Zanatta, A. B., Lucca, S. R., Sobral, R. C., Stephan, C., & Bandini, M. (2019). Stress and coping among workers at psychosocial care centers in the interior of the state of Sao Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Do Trabalho, 17(1), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1679443520190300
Derechos de autor 2023 Psicologia em Estudo
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0.
As opiniões emitidas, são de exclusiva responsabilidade do(s) autor(es). Ao submeterem o manuscrito ao Conselho Editorial de Psicologia em Estudo, o(s) autor(es) assume(m) a responsabilidade de não ter previamente publicado ou submetido o mesmo manuscrito por outro periódico. Em caso de autoria múltipla, o manuscrito deve vir acompanhado de autorização assinada por todos os autores. Artigos aceitos para publicação passam a ser propriedade da revista, podendo ser remixados e reaproveitados conforme prevê a licença Creative Commons CC-BY.
The opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the author (s). When submitting the manuscript to the Editorial Board of Study Psychology, the author (s) assumes responsibility for not having previously published or submitted the same manuscript by another journal. In case of multiple authorship, the manuscript must be accompanied by an authorization signed by all authors. Articles accepted for publication become the property of the journal, and can be remixed and reused as provided for in theby a license Creative Commons CC-BY.
