THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ENGLISH AND PORTUGUESE LITERATURES

Keywords: Best interests of the child, child’s development, child’s rights.

Abstract

The best interests of the child (BIC) should be of primary consideration in any situation involving children. Thus, BIC is commonly adopted as a principle, doctrine or test to weight decision-making regarding children. This study consists of an integrative literature review of English and Portuguese publications aimed at investigating how various studies address BIC definitions, characteristics and applications. The inclusion criteria were: 1) articles published between 2012 and 2017, and 2) those clearly addressing a BIC definition, characteristic and/or application. The chosen English databases were ASSIA, PsychARTICLES, PsychInfo, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar; the Portuguese databases were: LILACS, PePsic, Redalyc, Periódicos CAPES and Google Scholar. The main descriptor used was ‘best interests of the child’ which led to 1488 articles being found, and 14 selected. Brazilian articles have focused on the need to protect the child’s physical and psycho-socioemotional well-being, highlighting the child as a subject of rights, and maintaining child’s familial bonds. English articles have broadened the BIC perspective, highlighting the child’s idiosyncrasies, the role of the parent’s interests, and BIC as non-individualistic, flexible and complex. Other results show that BIC is largely related to the child’s development, which is divided into ‘material-physiological’ (basic needs and surviving) and ‘contextual’ (non-material and psychosocial and emotional needs) domains. Overall, BIC is a pluralistic, complex and multi-dimensional construct that depends on the child’s relational contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Josimar Antônio de Alcântara Mendes, University of Sussex
Doctoral Researcher pela University of Sussex
Thomas Ormerod, University of Sussex
Professor and Head of School of Psychology, University of Sussex

References

Adams, K. B. (2016). Systematic Reviews of the Literature. Retrieved: March 20, 2018 from https://academiccoachingandwriting.org/academic-writing/academic-writing-blog/x-systematic-reviews-of-the-literature

Ariès, P. (2012). História social da criança e da família (2a ed., Flaksman, D., trad.). Rio de Janeiro, RJ: LTC.

Block, M. (2011). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. In Encyclopedia of child behavior and development (pp. 913-915). Springer US.

Bobar, C. F. (2016). Considerations on the Best Interests of the Child as a Principle of Exercising Parental Authority. Journal of Legal Studies, 18(32), 88-96.

Custer, L. B. (1978). The Origins of the Doctrine of Parens Patriae. Emory LJ, 27, 195-208.

Funderburk, C. (2013). Best Interest of the Child Should Not Be an Ambiguous Term. Child. Legal Rts. J., 33, 229-266.

Hamper, C. (2014). Can Life in Prison be in the Best Interests of the Child. Ohio NUL Rev., 41, 201-225.

Lobachev, S. (2008). Top languages in global information production. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 3(2), 1-12.

Mendes, J. A. A., & Bucher-Maluschke, J. S. N. F (in press). Famílias em Litígio e o Princípio do Melhor Interesse da Criança na Disputa de Guarda. Interação em Psicologia.

Mendes, J. A. A., Bucher-Maluschke, J. S. N. F., Vasconcelos, D. F., de Souza, G. G., & Costa, P. V. M. N. (2016a). Perspectiva sistêmica: um olhar necessário para atuação dos atores jurídicos junto à disputa de guarda. Nova Perspectiva Sistêmica, 25(54), 88-104.

Mendes, J. A. A., Bucher-Maluschke, J. S. N. F., Vasconcelos, D. F., Fernandes, G. A., & Costa, P. V. M. N. (2016b). Psycho-legal publications about parental alienation: an integrative review of literature in portuguese. Psicologia em Estudo, 21(1), 161-174.

Mendes, J. A. A., & Bucher-Maluschke, J. S. N. F (2017a). Destructive divorce in the Family Life Cycle and its implications: criticisms of Parental Alienation. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 33(2), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e33423.

Mendes, J. A. D. A. M., & Bucher-Malusche, J. S. N. F. (2017b). Coping e racionalização: Atuação de advogados nos casos de disputa de guarda. Interação em Psicologia, 21(3), 230-238. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/psi.v21i3.51414

Morgan-Rallis, H. (2014). Guidelines for writing the Literature Review. Retrieved: March 20, 2018 from http://www.duluth.umn.edu/~hrallis/guides/researching/litreview.html

Moyo, A. (2012). Reconceptualising the 'paramountcy principle': Beyond the individualistic construction of the best interests of the child. African Human Rights Law Journal, 12(1), 142-177.

Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS computational biology, 9(7), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149

Pimentel, D. (2016). Protecting the Free-Range Kid: Recalibrating Parents' Rights and the Best Interest of the Child. Cardozo L. Rev., 38(1), 1-57.

Pomerance, B. (2013). Not Just Child's Play: Why Recognizing Fundamental Principles of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child as Jus Cogens Would Give Needed Power to an Important International Document. Gonz. J. Int'l L., 16(2), 22-50.

Ribeiro, M. R. S., & Costa, L. F. (2015). Da invisibilidade à participação: A expressão da criança em disputas de guarda. Revista de Psicología, 24(2), 1-15.

Rossato, M., & A. M. Martínez, A. (2013). Desenvolvimento da subjetividade: análise de histórias de superação das dificuldades de aprendizagem. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 17(2), 289-298.

Shaw, M. (2016). Commentary for “Examining the use of ‘parental alienation syndrome’”. Journal of Child Custody, 13(2-3), 144-146.

Sormunen, M. (2016). ‘In All Actions Concerning Children’?. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 24(1), 155-184.

Souza, M. T., Silva, M. D. &, Carvalho, R. (2010). Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein, (8)1, 102-6.

Sund, L. G., & Vackermo, M. (2015). The Interest Theory, Children’s Rights and Social Authorities. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 23(4), 752-768.

Toros, K., Valma, K., & Tiko, A. (2014). Interpretation of the Principle of “Best Interests of the Child” in the Context of Inter-Parental Child Custody Disputes: Case of Estonia. Journal of Social Welfare and Human Rights, 2(1), 289-303.

Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) (2018). How to Conduct a Literature Review (Health Sciences). Retrieved: March 20, 2018 from https://guides.library.vcu.edu/health-sciences-lit-review/selection-criteria

World Economic Forum (WEF) (2018). These are the world’s most spoken languages. Retrieved: September 25, 2018 from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/02/chart-of-the-day-these-are-the-world-s-most-spoken-languages/

Zago, C. R., & Ribeiro, E. A. W. (2017). Altas habilidades/superdotação e o atendimento educacional especializado na educação profissional, técnica e tecnológica: desafios e perspectivas. Revista Dynamis, 23(1), 95-111.

Zermatten, J. (2010). The best interests of the child principle: Literal analysis and function. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 18(4), 483-499.

Published
2019-08-07
How to Cite
Mendes, J. A. de A., & Ormerod, T. (2019). THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ENGLISH AND PORTUGUESE LITERATURES. Psicologia Em Estudo, 24. https://doi.org/10.4025/psicolestud.v24i0.45021
Section
Artigos originais

 

0.3
2019CiteScore
 
 
7th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.3
2019CiteScore
 
 
7th percentile
Powered by  Scopus