HISTORY OF A FRAMEWORK AND THE FRAMEWORK OF A STORY AUTISM NARRATIVES
Abstract
With the growing public interest in autism, we witness a critical twist in the debate that characterizes this subject. Initially reduced to the scientific field – generally medical – the issue of autism has been progressively taken over by different agents, especially by the autistic themselves, whose contributions have greatly expanded on what we may know about autism nowadays. With the term autism narratives, this article aims to demonstrate the richness of these new knowledge contributions to the scientific and political debate on the issue and demonstrate its risk of remaining encapsulated and restricted to the strictly scientific field. For this purpose, we go through the history of the concept, highlighting how it has been affected the scientific course enriched by these other agents' influence and the value of considering the various narratives about autism. Situating the diversity of these narratives is not only to retake a plural and open position against an exclusive and restrictive one but, instead, to put into action what may happen to the scientific debate when it does not close itself too much over the organization's objective tendency of scientific discourse.
Downloads
References
REFERÊNCIAS
Donvan, J. & Zucker, C. (2017). Outra sintonia: a história do autismo (Trad. L. A. De
Araújo). São Paulo: Companhia das Letras
Eyal, G., Hart, B., Onculer, E., Oren, N & Rossi, N. (2010). The autism matrix: the
social origins of the autism epidemic. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Grandin, T. & Scariano, M. M. (2014). Uma menina estranha: autobiografia de uma
autista. São Paulo: Editora Schwarcz.
Hassal, R. (2016). Does everybody with an Autism diagnosis have the same underlying
condition?. In K. Runswick-Cole, R. Mallet & S. Timimi. (Orgs.), Re-thinking autism: diagnosis, identity and equality. (pp. 49-66). London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Kanner, L. (2012). Os distúrbios autísticos do contato afetivo (pp. 111-170). In P. S.
Rocha (Org.). Autismos. São Paulo: Escuta (Texto original publicado em 1943).
Lacan, J. (1998). A ciência e a verdade. In: J. Lacan. Escritos. (p. 869-892). Rio de
Janeiro: JZE.
Lyotard, J-F. (1989). A condição pós-moderna. Lisboa: Gradiva
Maleval, J-C. (2017). O autista e a sua voz (Trad. P. S. De Souza Jr). São Paulo:
Blucher.
Mottron, L. (2004). L’autisme: une autre intelligence: Diagnostic, cognition et support
des personnes autistes sans déficience intelectuelle. Bruxelles: Mardaga.
Ortega, F; Zorzanelli, R. & Rios, C. (2016). The Biopolitics of Autism in Brazil. In K.
Runswick-Cole, R. Mallet & S. Timimi. (Orgs.) Re-thinking autism: diagnosis, identity and equality. (pp. 67-89). London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Popper, K. (1995). A lógica da pesquisa científica. São Paulo: Cultrix.
Runswick, K., Mallet, R. & Timimi, S. (2016). Introduction. In K. Runswick-Cole, R.
Malllet & S. Timimi. (Orgs.), Re-thinking autism: diagnosis, identity and equality (pp. 7-15). London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Runswick, K. (2016). Understanding this Thing called Autism. In K. Runswick-Cole; R.
Mallet & S. Timimi. (Orgs.), Re-thinking autism: diagnosis, identity and equality (pp. 19-29). London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Silberman, S. (2016). Neurotribes: the legacy of autism and the future of neurodiversity.
New York: Avery.
Thomas, M-C. (2011). L’autisme et les langues. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Copyright (c) 2021 Psicologia em Estudo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
As opiniões emitidas, são de exclusiva responsabilidade do(s) autor(es). Ao submeterem o manuscrito ao Conselho Editorial de Psicologia em Estudo, o(s) autor(es) assume(m) a responsabilidade de não ter previamente publicado ou submetido o mesmo manuscrito por outro periódico. Em caso de autoria múltipla, o manuscrito deve vir acompanhado de autorização assinada por todos os autores. Artigos aceitos para publicação passam a ser propriedade da revista, podendo ser remixados e reaproveitados conforme prevê a licença Creative Commons CC-BY.
The opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the author (s). When submitting the manuscript to the Editorial Board of Study Psychology, the author (s) assumes responsibility for not having previously published or submitted the same manuscript by another journal. In case of multiple authorship, the manuscript must be accompanied by an authorization signed by all authors. Articles accepted for publication become the property of the journal, and can be remixed and reused as provided for in theby a license Creative Commons CC-BY.
