<b>Post-babel readings: a derridian proposal

  • Atílio Butturi Junior Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Keywords: reading theories, post-modernity, deconstruction, iteration

Abstract

Current essay discusses some contemporary conceptions of reading and discusses the possibility of a deconstruction of today’s paradigms related to the logocentrism of most theories and practices of official reading. A Derridean perspective is employed while taking into account the proposals of supplementation and iteration. A theory of reading is initially described from the social, psychological and contextual theories. They are, as a rule, counterpoised as modern and post-modern theories of reading. Further, Jacques Derrida’s reading proposal is provided, based on the problematization of Austin’s pragmatics, and thenceforth, in a denial of the possibility of saturation of the reading contexts. There is the need to rethink the current concepts of reading according to the suspension of official contextual models to discuss the power relations involved in logophobia that pervades debates in the field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Atílio Butturi Junior, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Graduado em Letras pela Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (2004); Mestre em Lingüística na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (2008), com trabalho voltado à Filosofia da Lingüística; Doutor em Lingüística na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, pesquisando o discurso sexual brasileiro na modalidade do dispositivo foucauldiano. Atualmente, é professor adjunto II da Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, campus Erechim, e coordenador da Especialização em Teorias Linguísticas Contemporâneas da mesma instituição.
Published
2015-07-28
How to Cite
Butturi Junior, A. (2015). <b&gt;Post-babel readings: a derridian proposal. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 37(2), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v37i2.22721
Section
Linguistics

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus