<b>Literature, memory and identity in ‘Infância’, by Graciliano Ramos

  • Cátia Silene Kupssinskü Universidade Feevale
  • Juracy Assmann Saraiva Universidade Feevale
Keywords: literature, memory, identity, ‘Infância’, Graciliano Ramos.

Abstract

 

The purpose of this article is a reflection on literature and its relation to memory - individual and collective - and to identity. The literary works make use of memory for the constitution of fictional plots, seeking the source that supports the representation of reality. Memory, in turn, has direct relation with social and individual identities, since, through its exposition, it allows the elaboration of the image by which individuals are represented before themselves and others. The corpus of this study is the literary work Infância, published by Graciliano Ramos, in 1954, in which the author reports, through memories, his life from two years to eleven. The inductive analysis of the work is guided by constructs by authors such as Aristotle (2005), Paul Ricoeur (1994), Michael Pollak (1992), Fernando Catroga (2001) and Kathryn Woodward (2012) – all of which deal with aspects related to literature, memory and identity.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Cátia Silene Kupssinskü, Universidade Feevale
Doutoranda e Mestre pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Processos e Manifestações Culturais da Universidade Feevale. Bolsista CAPES (processo número 88887154139/2017-00). Graduada em Moda pela mesma instituição.
Juracy Assmann Saraiva, Universidade Feevale
Pós-Doutora em Teoria Literária pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Professora e pesquisadora da Universidade Feevale e bolsista de produtividade do CNPq.
Published
2018-10-01
How to Cite
Kupssinskü, C. S., & Saraiva, J. A. (2018). <b&gt;Literature, memory and identity in ‘Infância’, by Graciliano Ramos. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 40(2), e41030. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v40i2.41030
Section
Literature

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus