<b>For a genealogical systematization of layers of meaning of the onion model of utterance-meaning: the speaker’s perspective</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i4.15483

  • Selmo Ribeiro Figueiredo Junior Universidade Federal do Paraná
Keywords: pragmatics, utterance, structure

Abstract

Considering the hearer’s perspective in the communication, Dascal (2006) presents his Onion Model (OM) as conception about the utterance-meaning, taking it as a set of different layers. In this paper, the proposal will be approach the OM through the speaker’s perspective (OMS) and additionally systematize it. The systematization will consist to identify the elements of the utterance under a hierarchical order, whose sequence proposed is (the contingent elements are in parentheses): pragmatic presuppositions; reason of utterance; propositional content of the sentence; (unconscious information); (emotional component of meaning); interference from the conversational record; felicity conditions of the speech act; perlocutionary force; (conversational implicature); modality; illocutionary force; neustic character of the utterance. The discussion that will be offer is deductively oriented and search for justify the arguments this formulation.


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Selmo Ribeiro Figueiredo Junior, Universidade Federal do Paraná
Mestrando em Estudos Linguísticos na UFPR, na linha de pesquisa Texto, Discurso e Pragmática: teorias e interfaces. No Grupo de Pesquisa Linguagem e Cultura (UFPR-CNPq), está na linha Pragmática e Cognição.
Published
2013-09-23
How to Cite
Figueiredo Junior, S. R. (2013). <b>For a genealogical systematization of layers of meaning of the onion model of utterance-meaning: the speaker’s perspective</b&gt; - doi: 10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i4.15483. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 35(4), 313-320. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascilangcult.v35i4.15483
Section
Linguistics

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus

 

 

0.1
2019CiteScore
 
 
45th percentile
Powered by  Scopus