The work that is presented in this round table includes, from the analysis of specific literary productions, the ways of representing the national reality with the official speeches written in history. The overflow nocturnal (Matos Mar, 2004) and denial (Kusch, 1975) in their dialectical relationship of opposition, contrast and tension, structuring the hypotheses of meaning that advance, in a reasoned and accurate way, beyond the investigations. In this way, the way in which the historiographic discourse focuses on ideological biases that generate subalternities is evidenced. However, through a careful review, specifically of the literature and its specific capacity to recreate the social imaginary, we were able to take advantage of the subliminal senses, the silenced vocations and the marginal identities in this circulating space.
Published:
2021-04-16
