From established science to class room science, or how to take into account didactic activity in the history of science

  • Bruno Belhoste Université Paris 1
Keywords: Historiography of Science, Science Education, Scientific Practice, Didactic Transposition

Abstract

This paper deals with the relationship between science and education in historiography, questioning the separation between the two activities, and highlighting the role of education to scientific activity. First, it distinguishes the largely accepted needs of historical contextualization from the epistemological problem, related to the place of history education in the history of science. It defends that the history of science education is not foreign to the history of science. It criticizes Chevallard’s notion of didactic transposition for reinforcing the gap between scientific knowledge and teaching knowledge. Finally, it argues that the sciences are in permanent reconstruction and that scientific knowledge is not tied to socio-cultural contexts from which it emerged.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Bruno Belhoste, Université Paris 1
Université Paris 1– Sorbonne Panthéon.
Published
2012-02-23
How to Cite
Belhoste, B. (2012). From established science to class room science, or how to take into account didactic activity in the history of science. Revista Brasileira De História Da Educação, 11(3 [27]), 47-61. Retrieved from https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/rbhe/article/view/38763
Section
Original research