Empatia no Ensino Religioso na Inglaterra
Da abordagem baseada na Bíblia à abordagem multirreligiosa e fenomenológica (1944–2020)
Resumo
La transición de los años sesenta a los años setenta marcó un cambio de paradigma en la enseñanza religiosa en Inglaterra, pasando de un enfoque confesional y centrado en la Biblia a un modelo multirreligioso y fenomenológico, que pasó a incluir también cosmovisiones no religiosas. Esta transición, influida por el creciente multiculturalismo, redefinió los objetivos y los contenidos de la disciplina, otorgando a la empatía un papel más central. Partiendo del modelo tripartito de Bell sobre los programas de enseñanza religiosa elaborados desde la Education Act de 1944, este artículo examina cómo la empatía se ha incorporado en los currículos y en los manuales escolares. A través del análisis de programas, libros de texto y guías para el profesorado, se explora cómo los cambios de paradigma y los objetivos de cohesión social moldearon la integración de la competencia empática.
Downloads
Referências
American Academy of Religion. (n.d.). What is religious literacy? https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/what-we-do/our-approach/what-religious-literacy
Anderson, C., Lear, C., & Wilbourne, R. (2017). Religious studies: GCSE AQA A for the grade 9–1 course. Coordination Group Publications.
Bell, A. (1985). Agreed syllabuses of religious education. In I. Goodson (Ed.), Social histories of the secondary curriculum: Subjects for study. Falmer Press.
Burgess, H. W. (1996). Models of religious education. Baker Book House.
Chauvigné, C., & Fabre, M. (2021). Questions socially living: those possible approaches in the school environment? Carrefours de l'éducation 2021/2 (52), 5–31.
Cole, O. (1975). Religion in the multi-faith school: A tool for teachers. Bradford Educational Services Committee.
Cooper, B. (2011). Empathy in education: Engagement, values and achievement. Continuum.
Copley, T. (2008). Teaching religion: Sixty years of religious education in England and Wales. University of Exeter Press.
Cornille, C. (2010). Empathy and inter-religious imagination. In R. Kearney & E. Rizo-Patrón (Eds.), Traversing the heart: Journeys of the inter-religious imagination. Brill.
Cornwall Council. (2020). Cornwall agreed syllabus 2020–2025. https://www.schools.cornwall.gov.uk/Page/36275
County Council of the West Riding of Yorkshire Education Department. (1966). Suggestions for religious education: West Riding agreed syllabus. Chorley & Pickersgill.
Durham County Council. (2020). Agreed syllabus for religious education in Durham 2020. https://oustonprimary.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Agreed-Syllabus-for-Religous-Education-in-Durham-2020.pdf
Education Reform Act 1988. (1988). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/40/contents
Fleming, M., Smith, P., & Worden, D. (2016a). Religious studies A Islam (AQA GCSE). Oxford University Press.
Fleming, M., Smith, P., & Worden, D. (2016b). Religious studies A Christianity (AQA). Oxford University Press.
Frevert, U. (2011). Emotions in history: Lost and found. Central European University Press.
Fuller, M., Kamans, E., van Vuuren, M., Wolfensberger, M., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2021). Conceptualizing empathy competence: A professional communication perspective. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(3), 333–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519211001125
Gallagher, E. V. (2009). Teaching for religious literacy. Teaching Theology and Religion, 12(3), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9647.2009.00523.x
Gillard, D. (1991). Agreed syllabuses 1944–1988: Changing aims—changing content? http://www.educationengland.org.uk/articles/10agreed.html
Grimmitt, M. (1973). What can I do in R.E.? Mayhew-McCrimmon.
Hammond, J., Hay, D., Moxon, J., Netto, B., Raban, K., Straughier, G., & Williams, C. (1990). New methods in R.E. teaching: An experiential approach. Oliver & Boyd.
Harvard Divinity School. (n.d.). What is religious literacy? https://rpl.hds.harvard.edu/what-we-do/our-approach/what-religious-literacy
Hayward, M. (n.d.). A brief history of SHAP. https://www.shapcalendar.org.uk/history.html
Heron, J., & Reason, P. (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research. SAGE.
Hirsch, S. (2016). Quelle place accorder aux thèmes sensibles dans l’enseignement d’Éthique et culture religieuse au Québec ? Zeitschrift für Religionskunde | Revue de didactique des sciences des religions, 2, 78-87. https://doi.org/10.26034/fr.zfrk.2016.019
Jackson, R. (2019). Religious education for plural societies. Routledge.
Kimanen, A. (2022). Enhancing informed empathy as a key to promoting social justice in religious education classes. Journal of Religious Education, 70, 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-022-00159-9
Large, C. (2002). This is RE! Book 1. Hodder Education.
Large, C., & Brown, A. (2004). This is RE! Book 3. John Murray.
Laxton, W. (1980). Paths to understanding. Hampshire Education Authority.
Levrau, F. (2021). Religious education and social cohesion: A normative stance. In L. Franken & B. Gent (Eds.), Islamic religious education in Europe. Routledge.
Lucenti, M. (2023). L'educazione alla pace nei programmi e manuali scolastici di Religious Education in Inghilterra (1970-2020). MeTis – Mondi educativi. Temi, indagini, suggestioni, vol.13, n.1, 369–392. https://www.metisjournal.it/index.php/metis/article/view/583
Lucenti, M. (Ed.). (2025). Teaching religious education: challenges, developments and current debates in comparative perspective (Brill Research Perspectives in Religion and Education). Brill.
Lucenti, M., & Hirsch, S. (2022). Educational policies on inclusion and interculturality: What is the impact on didactic tools? Comparative analysis between Italy and Quebec, In M. Gadille (Ed.), 2nd SFERE/Ampiric conference proceedings. Learning, strategies and educational policies. What interdisciplinarity, methodologies and international perspectives? De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.2478/9788366675841
Melloni, A. (Ed.). (2014). Rapporto sull’analfabetismo religioso in Italia. Il Mulino.
Moore, D. (2007). Overcoming religious illiteracy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Moosavi, L. (2015). The racialization of Muslim converts in Britain and their experiences of Islamophobia. Critical Sociology, 41(1), 41–56.
Pajer, F. (2017). Educazione alla cittadinanza e istruzione religiosa. Catechetica ed educazione, 2(2), 99–111.
Parker, S., & Freathy, R. (2011). Context, complexity and contestation: Birmingham’s agreed syllabuses. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 32(2), 247–263.
Parker, S., Freathy, R., & Francis, L. J. (2012). Ethnic diversity, Christian hegemony and the emergence of multi-faith religious education. History of Education, 41(3), 381–404.
Peach, C. (2005). Britain’s Muslim population: An overview. In T. Abbas (Ed.), Muslim Britain. Zed Books.
Priestley, J. (2009). Agreed syllabuses: Their history and development. In M. de Souza et al. (Eds.), International handbook of the religious, moral and spiritual dimensions in education (Vol. 1). Springer.
Smart, N. (1986). Concept and empathy. New York University Press.
Trothen, T. J. (2016). Engaging the borders: Empathy, religious studies, and pre-professional fields. Teaching Theology & Religion, 19(3), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/teth.12336
Weil, S. (2009). Waiting for God. HarperCollins.
Worcestershire County Council. (2015). Agreed syllabus for religious education 2015–2020. https://www.astley.worcs.sch.uk/images/Worcestershire_agreed_syllabus_for_Religious_Education_2015-2020.pdf.
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Lucenti (Autor)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os direitos autorais pertencem exclusivamente aos autores. Os direitos de licenciamento utilizados pelo periódico consistem na licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0): são permitidos o acompartilhamento (cópia e distribuição do material em qualqer meio ou formato) e adaptação (remix, transformação e criação de material a partir do conteúdo assim licenciado) para quaisquer fins, inclusive comerciais.
Recomenda-se a leitura desse link para maiores informações sobre o tema: fornecimento de créditos e referências de forma correta, entre outros detalhes cruciais para uso adequado do material licenciado.
