Artifial Intelligence and extrajudicial services

Analogical application of cnj resolution no. 615/2025 as a response to the regulatory gap

Abstract

The article analyzes the regulation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Brazilian Law, focusing on Resolution No. 615/2025 of the National Council of Justice (CNJ) and its possible analogous application to extrajudicial notary and registry offices. The central problem is to determine the extent to which the guidelines established for the Judiciary can overcome the absence of a specific regulatory framework for notarial services, ensuring legal certainty and preserving public faith. The objective is to critically examine Resolution No. 615/2025, evaluating its relevance to the extrajudicial sector, which currently faces a regulatory vacuum. The hypothesis is that the principles set forth in the Resolution (transparency, explainability, non-discrimination, accountability, and the supremacy of the human element) are compatible and applicable to the extrajudicial sector, in accordance with the LINDB. The method adopted was qualitative, exploratory, and descriptive, based on bibliographic and documentary review, supported by national and foreign scholarship, in addition to the analysis of norms such as the LGPD and CNJ’s Provision No. 149/2023. The justification stems from the regulatory vacuum that compromises data protection, uniformity of services, and parameters for inspection by the State Common Justice, requiring a provisional measure. The relevance of the study lies in offering a practical and theoretical contribution to the debate on Digital Law, promoting innovation aligned with constitutional values. As a result, the hypothesis is confirmed. The conclusion indicates that Resolution No. 615/2025 can function as a provisional solution until the enactment of specific legislation, ensuring that technology serves citizenship and democracy.