The labour category analitical centrality for the Physical Education
Abstract
The aim of this article was to discuss the need of getting the Labour centrality back to the physical education analysis. With the arising of new production technologies based on micro-electronics, the trend for questioning this category centrality has increased causing reactions on both the Labour Sociology (ANTUNES, 2000, 2002) and the Labour and Education fields with FRIGOTTO(1997,1998,2001) and KUENZER’s (1998) analyses. Supported by these studies and other ones as well, a historical approach on the labour and physical education relation was performed, and, in the second part of this study, a current analysis of this relation was also carried out. The study showed that the Labour category should play a certain role in the analytical repertory of physical education teachers in order to allow them not to use their analysis to emphasise certain social relations that make any concern about a society and an education which effectively regards men in all aspects impossible.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
Published
2008-05-28
How to Cite
1.
Herold Junior C. The labour category analitical centrality for the Physical Education. JPhysEduc [Internet]. 2008May28 [cited 2025Sep.13];14(2):85-. Available from: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/3634
Issue
Section
Review Articles
• Authors retain the copyright and full publishing rights without restrictions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.