Avaliação final no curso de Pedagogia: inovações para melhores experiências de aprendizagem
Resumo
A avaliação da aprendizagem é parte essencial do processo educativo e é ainda mais importante ao se tratar de cursos de licenciatura. Procedimentos avaliativos estarão presentes ao longo da futura carreira docente de estudantes e, além disso, podem ser entendidos como mais uma oportunidade de construção de conhecimentos, seja na preparação, seja enquanto experiência prática. As práticas educativas de cursos de licenciatura precisam estar em constante inovação para garantir que a qualidade educacional se estenda até às escolas. O presente artigo traz os primeiros achados de uma Pesquisa Ação em Educação que objetiva promover melhorias na avaliação final de um curso de Pedagogia. O texto se estrutura em um diálogo reflexivo-propositivo de falas de estudantes e examinadoras com a literatura científica acerca do tema. Nesta primeira fase da pesquisa qualitativa foram realizadas entrevistas semiestruturadas com oito estudantes de Pedagogia e cinco avaliadoras de exames finais no mesmo curso. Os resultados identificaram duas questões principais: sofrimento psicológico de estudantes e falta de informação sobre a avaliação final. A partir disso, mudanças no processo avaliativo do curso foram colocadas em prática para dar seguimento à pesquisa ação que, atualmente, se encontra no segundo momento de avaliação com estudantes que estão passando pela avaliação final com novas práticas.
Downloads
Referências
Albalawi, H., & Nadeem, M. (2020). Exploring the impact of ineffective formal communication between teachers and students: a case study of Mustaqbal University and Jubail University College, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 13(3), 68-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n3p68
Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (2006). Rubrics: tools for making learning goals and evaluation criteria explicit for both teachers and learners. CBE Life Sciences Education, 5(3), 197-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-06-0168
Aubrecht, K. (2013). The new vocabulary of resilience and the governance of university student life. Studies in Social Justice, 6(1), 67-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v6i1.1069
Baş, K. (2019). The Relationship between Classroom Management Skills and Self-confidence of Social Studies Teachers. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 7(4), 62-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/AIAC.IJELS.V.7N.4P.62
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551-575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Brown, A., & Danaher, P. A. (2019). CHE Principles: facilitating authentic and dialogical semi-structured interviews in educational research. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 42(1), 76-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1379987
Cardozo, L. T., Azevedo, M. A, Carvalho, M., Costa, R., Lima, P., & Marcondes. (2020). Effect of an active learning methodology combined with formative assessments on performance, test anxiety, and stress of university students. Advances in Physiology Education, 44(4), 744-751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00075.2020
Dolan, B. M., Arnold, J., & Green, M. M. (2019). Establishing Trust When Assessing Learners: Barriers and Opportunities. Academic Medicine, 4(12), 1851-1853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002982
Dolin, J., Black, P., Wynne, H., & Tiberghien, A. (2017). Exploring relations between formative and summative assessment. In J. Dolin, & R. Evans (Eds.). Transforming assessment: through an interplay between practice, research, and policy (p. 54-80). Cham, CH: Springer International Publishing.
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. … Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 13-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y
Entwistle, N., Thompson, S., & Tait, H. (2020). Guidelines for Promoting Effective Learning in Higher Education. Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction. University of Edinburgh.
Gadosey, C., Schnettler, T., Scheunemann, A., Fries, S., & Grunschel, C. (2021). The intraindividual co-occurrence of anxiety and hope in procrastination episodes during exam preparations: An experience sampling study. Learning and Individual Differences, 88, 102013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102013
Galanakis, M. J., Palaiologou, A., Patsi, G., Velegraki, I.-M., & Darviri, C. (2016). A Literature review on the connection between stress and self-esteem. Psychology, 7(5), 687-694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/PSYCH.2016.75071
Geller, J., Toftness, A. R., Armstrong, P. I., Carpenter, S. K., Manz, C. L., Coffman, C. R., & Lamm, M. H. (2017). Study strategies and beliefs about learning as a function of academic achievement and achievement goals. Memory, 26(5), 683-690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2017.1397175
Hsu, J. L., & Goldsmith, G. R. (2021). Instructor strategies to alleviate stress and anxiety among college and university STEM students. CBE Life Sciences Education, 20(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-08-0189
Johnson, J., Adkins, D., & Chauvin, S. (2020). A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), 138-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7120
Kayarkaya, B., & Unaldi, A. (2020). What you might not be assessing through a multiple choice test task. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(1), 98-113. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21449/ijate.699494
Kilgour, P., Northcote, M., Williams, A., & Kilgour, A. (2020). A plan for the co-construction and collaborative use of rubrics for student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 140-153. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1614523
Kim, E., & Pratt, S. M. (2021). The impact on pre-service teachers’ perceptions toward co-teaching from being a learner in co-taught college courses. Action in Teacher Education, 43(3), 301-320. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2020.1848663
Kruit, P., Oostdam, R., van den Berg, E., & Schuitema, J. (2020). Performance assessment as a diagnostic tool for science teachers. Research in Science Education, 50, 1093-1117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9724-9
Lorencová, H., Jarošová, E., Avgitidou, S., & Dimitriadou, C. (2019). Critical thinking practices in teacher education programmes: a systematic review. Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), 844-859. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586331
Mahdiani, H., & Ungar, M. (2021). The dark side of resilience. Adversity and Resilience Science, 2(3), 147-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S42844-021-00031-Z
Mazer, J., McKenna-Buchanan, T., Quinlan, M., & Titsworth, S. (2014). The dark side of emotion in the classroom: emotional processes as mediators of teacher communication behaviors and student negative emotions. Communication Education, 63(3), 149-168. DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2014.904047
MŠMT. (1998). Zákon Č. 111/1998 Sb., O Vysokých Školách. Retrieved from https://Www.Msmt.Cz/Vyzkum-a-Vyvoj-2/Zakon-c-111-1998-Sb-o-Vysokych-Skolach
Muteti, C. Z., Zarraga, C., Jacob, B. I., Mwarumba, T. M., Nkhata, D. B., Mwavita, M., ... Mutambuki, J. M. (2021). The influence of explicit teaching of metacognition on students’ study strategies in a general chemistry I course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22, 122-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d0rp00217h
Nakhla, G. (2019). The relationship between fear of failure, academic motivation and student engagement in higher education: A general linear model. [Doctoral Thesis, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/827
Norton, L. (2008). Action Research in Teaching and Learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. Routledge.
Pozo-Muñoz, C., Rebolloso-Pacheco, E., & Fernández-Ramírez, B. (2000) The 'Ideal Teacher'. Implications for student evaluation of teacher effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(3), 253-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930050135121
Restrepo, E. (2020). Decolonizar la universidad. In J. Barboza, & L. Pereira (Eds.), Investigación cualitativa emergente: reflexiones y casos (p. 11-25). Cecar Editorial. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21892/9789585547797.1
Rodrigues, R. G. B. (2021). Uma prática avaliativa formativa utilizando a prova-com-consulta-ao-caderno em uma disciplina de cálculo (Tese de Doutorado). Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Londrina.
Sharp, J., & Theiler, S. (2018). A review of psychological distress among university students: Pervasiveness, implications and potential points of intervention. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 40(3), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-018-9321-7
Schellekens, L., Bok, H., de Jong, L., van der Schaaf, M., Kremer, W., & van der Vleuten, C. (2021). A scoping review on the notions of Assessment as Learning (AaL), Assessment for Learning (AfL), and Assessment of Learning (AoL). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71, 101094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101094
Tezci, E., Erdener, M. A., & Atıcı, S. (2016). The effect of pre-service teachers' epistemological beliefs on teaching approaches. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(12A), 205-215. DOI: http://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016
Theobold, A. S. (2021). Oral exams: a more meaningful assessment of students’ understanding. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 29(2), 156-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2021.1914527
Williams-Brown, Z., & Mander, S. (2021). Childhood Well-being and Resilience: Influences on Educational Outcomes. Routledge.
Zaccone, M. C., & Pedrini, M. (2019). The effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on students learning effectiveness: exploring the moderating role of gender. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(6), 1381-1394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2019-0099
DECLARAÇÃO DE ORIGINALIDADE E DIREITOS AUTORAIS
Declaro que o presente artigo é original, não tendo sido submetido à publicação em qualquer outro periódico nacional ou internacional, quer seja em parte ou em sua totalidade.
Os direitos autorais pertencem exclusivamente aos autores. Os direitos de licenciamento utilizados pelo periódico é a licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0): são permitidos o compartilhamento (cópia e distribuição do material em qualquer suporte ou formato) e adaptação (remix, transformação e criação de material a partir do conteúdo assim licenciado para quaisquer fins, inclusive comerciais).
Recomenda-se a leitura desse link para maiores informações sobre o tema: fornecimento de créditos e referências de forma correta, entre outros detalhes cruciais para uso adequado do material licenciado.
